Abstract
THE fundamental fact about cancerous tissue is that it has escaped from the normal growth-controlling agents of the body. The escape often involves a change in histological type. The problems which are raised are clearly connected with those studied in experimental embryology, where again it is the causal mechanism underlying growth and histological change which is under investigation. Experimental embryology has recently made important advances, and the time has perhaps come when it would be profitable to consider the way in which the new embryological theories would formulate the well-known problems of cancer research.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Convergent evolution of a genomic rearrangement may explain cancer resistance in hystrico- and sciuromorpha rodents
npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease Open Access 01 September 2021
-
Common themes in tetrapod appendage regeneration: a cellular perspective
EvoDevo Open Access 17 June 2019
-
Urodele p53 tolerates amino acid changes found in p53 variants linked to human cancer
BMC Evolutionary Biology Open Access 28 September 2007
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Spemann, H., Arch. EntwMech., 43, 448; 1918. Arch. EntwMech., 100, 599; 1924.
Waddington and Schmidt, Arch. EntwMech., 128, 522; 1933. Waddington, J. Exp. Biol., 11, 211; 1934. Needham, Waddington and Needham, Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 114, 393; 1934.
Waddington, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, 221, 179; 1930.
Bautzmann, Holtfreter, Spemann, Mangold, Naturwiss., 51, 971; 1932. Holtfreter, Arch. EntwMech., 128, 584; 1933.
Waddington, NATURE, 131, 275; 1933. J. Exp. Biol., 11, 218; 1934.
Corner, cit. Robson, “Recent Advances in Sex and Reproductive Physiology” Churchill, 1934, p. 205.
Cf. Review by Dodds, Lancet, 1, 987; 1934.
Needham, Waddington and Needham, Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 114, 393; 1934. Waddington, Needham, Novinski, Needham and Lemberg, NATURE, 134, 103; 1934.
Waddington and Needham, Proc. Roy. Soc., B (in press).
Woerdeman, Koninl. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam, 36, 447; 1933.
Holtfreter, Naturwiss., 21, 766; 1933. Arch. EntwMech., 132, 307; 1934.
Woerdeman, Koninl. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam, 36, 189, 423; 1933.
For example, Spemann, Arch. EntwMech., 123, 289, 1931. Waddington and Schmidt, Arch. EntwMech., 128, 522, 1933. Mangold, Naturwiss., 21, 761, 1933.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WADDINGTON, C. Cancer and the Theory of Organisers. Nature 135, 606–608 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1038/135606a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/135606a0
This article is cited by
-
Convergent evolution of a genomic rearrangement may explain cancer resistance in hystrico- and sciuromorpha rodents
npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease (2021)
-
Tumor-stroma biomechanical crosstalk: a perspective on the role of caveolin-1 in tumor progression
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews (2020)
-
Common themes in tetrapod appendage regeneration: a cellular perspective
EvoDevo (2019)
-
The Work Surfaces of Morphogenesis: The Role of the Morphogenetic Field
Biological Theory (2014)
-
Between Biochemists and Embryologists – The Biochemical Study of Embryonic Induction in the 1930s
Journal of the History of Biology (2012)