Abstract
AMONG present-day biologists there is widespread interest in, and considerable disagreement on, the proper relationship between taxonomy and other branches of their science, especially genetics, cytology and ecology. Should the data provided by these branches be incorporated into the existing taxonomic categories, or should new categories be created to meet their needs?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Genetica, 11, 399 (1920).
See Du Rietz, Svensk. Bot. Tid., 24, 333 (1930).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilmour, J. A Taxonomic Problem. Nature 139, 1040–1042 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1038/1391040a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1391040a0
This article is cited by
-
Pheneticism reconsidered
Biology & Philosophy (2012)
-
Toward a Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Organizational Life
Journal of Bioeconomics (2005)
-
Numerical taxonomy and the principle of maximum entropy
Journal of Classification (1996)
-
Predictivity in taxonomy and the probability of a tree
Plant Systematics and Evolution (1989)
-
List of publications of John S. L. Gilmour
Plant Systematics and Evolution (1989)