Abstract
IN his inaugural lecture in 1936 as Tait professor of natural philosophy in the University of Edinburgh, Prof. Max Born referred to an essential difference between science and art. Mathematical and physical theories deserve well if they meet the intellectual needs of their period, whereas the creations of great artists are for all time. It might appear from this that mankind is obliged to reckon with continuous change in his scientific concepts, and can hope to find rest unto his soul only in the static nature of art. However this may be, it is no purpose of the present article to' insist upon such a distinction, but (Sn the contrary, rather to inquire into the conditions which exist (or may exist) tending to bring the worker in the 'exact sciences into contact with the world of art and its problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rawlins, F. The Natural Philosophy of Paintings. Nature 140, 219–220 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1038/140219a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/140219a0