Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News
  • Published:

The Natural Philosophy of Paintings

Abstract

IN his inaugural lecture in 1936 as Tait professor of natural philosophy in the University of Edinburgh, Prof. Max Born referred to an essential difference between science and art. Mathematical and physical theories deserve well if they meet the intellectual needs of their period, whereas the creations of great artists are for all time. It might appear from this that mankind is obliged to reckon with continuous change in his scientific concepts, and can hope to find rest unto his soul only in the static nature of art. However this may be, it is no purpose of the present article to' insist upon such a distinction, but (Sn the contrary, rather to inquire into the conditions which exist (or may exist) tending to bring the worker in the 'exact sciences into contact with the world of art and its problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rawlins, F. The Natural Philosophy of Paintings. Nature 140, 219–220 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1038/140219a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/140219a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing