Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Terminology in Biology

Abstract

DR. C. D. DARLINGTON1 raises a very important point in his condemnation of words which should be dead but are still in biological currency. Every teacher and every author of a text-book will sympathize. The beginner in biology has a hard enough task without having to be plagued by a spate of alternative terms, an infliction which too often leads him to think that all he has to do is to learn these terms and their synonyms in order to know his subject. To many students, a thing is known and understood as soon as a label has been attached to it. There is little wonder that biology is so subject to the reproach that it is nothing but a jumble of difficult words.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NATURE, 143, 206 (1939).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BARNES, B., HENTSCHEL, C. Terminology in Biology. Nature 143, 478 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1038/143478a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/143478a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing