Abstract
DAVIDSON BLACK had remarked on the great similarity between the first skull of Sinanthropus to be found and the Pithecanthropus skull of Trinil, a condition which induced him to see in Pithecanthropus a Hominid form closely related to Sinanthropus (1931). The additional finds of the latter, unearthed in the interval, have confirmed Black's interpretation in every respect. But on the other hand, since the Pithecanthropus finds remained restricted to that rather incomplete specimen of Trinil, absolute evidence for his true Hominid character was lacking. In such circumstances, there was no other way open but to await the discovery of additional Pithecanthropus material before definitely solving this problem.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
VON KOENIGSWALD, G., BANDOENG & WEIDENREICH, F. The Relationship between Pithecanthropus and Sinanthropus. Nature 144, 926–929 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1038/144926a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/144926a0
This article is cited by
-
Dr. Eugene Dubois
Nature (1941)
-
Human Genera and Species
Nature (1940)