Abstract
THE satisfaction which may quite legitimately be felt in the logical and painstaking work which enabled Rose to classify the amino acids into essential and non-essential groups rather dims the realization that his classification only refers to the needs of the growing rat. In his recent communication to NATURE, Mr. Bacharach1 gives a welcome jolt to the complacent attitude, so easily adopted, of assuming that what is true of the growing rat is true not only of the adult rat, but also of other species of animals. The work of Wolf and Corley2, and of Burroughs, Burroughs and Mitchell3, has shown, however, that the amino acids required to maintain nitrogen equilibrium in the adult rat are not entirely the same as those needed to make the young rat grow. These results illustrate the necessity of qualifying the term 'essential' when it is applied to amino acids.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NATURE, 149, 473 (1942).
Amer. J. Physiol., 127, 589 (1939).
J. Nutrition, 19, 363 (1940).
Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 48 726, 728 (1941).
J. Physiol. (U.S.S.R.), 17, 170 (1934).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GAUNT, W. Amino Acids and the Human Being. Nature 149, 666–667 (1942). https://doi.org/10.1038/149666c0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/149666c0