Abstract
THE persistence of road accidents is evidence of a sociological disorder. They are the painful symptoms, not the malady. An organized attempt to diagnose the disease has yet to be made. Even the symptoms (namely, the accidents) have hitherto been neither recorded nor analysed scientifically. Hence references to statistical records, though sometimes suggestive, are never convincing. The records hitherto have suffered from the directive given to them by a tendentious supposition—that accidents must be due to avoidable carelessness or malignancy. This was officially imputed to some drivers (road hogs); later to all drivers (lust of speed); later still to lack of care in all road users without exception (pedestrians, cyclists and drivers), that is, the whole community. Before blaming the 'human factor', inquiry should have been made as to whether the conditions in which road users have to move are such that no large group of human beings could, by taking any reasonable care, negotiate all the emergencies that present themselves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NATURE, 153, 330 (1944).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O'GORMAN, M. Road Accidents and Research. Nature 153, 623 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1038/153623a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/153623a0


