Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Misuse of the Term 'Evolution'

Abstract

A MAN 'inherits' the colour of his eyes from his ancestors ; that is a process which has to do with evolution. He may 'inherit' a house from them ; that is a different process, which in itself has nothing to do with evolution. Sir Arthur Keith's question, "Is not industry part of a nation's heritage? ", and what follows, show that he fails to distinguish between genetic and social changes. I still think this is a mistake, even if 'inherited' from Darwin. In some cases there will ; be a relation between social and genetic change, but specific evidence is to what it is and where it occurs is needed before it can reasonably be asserted. Sir Arthur Keith, I submit, does not produce such evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RITCHIE, A. Misuse of the Term 'Evolution'. Nature 157, 879 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1038/157879b0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/157879b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing