Abstract
A MAN 'inherits' the colour of his eyes from his ancestors ; that is a process which has to do with evolution. He may 'inherit' a house from them ; that is a different process, which in itself has nothing to do with evolution. Sir Arthur Keith's question, "Is not industry part of a nation's heritage? ", and what follows, show that he fails to distinguish between genetic and social changes. I still think this is a mistake, even if 'inherited' from Darwin. In some cases there will ; be a relation between social and genetic change, but specific evidence is to what it is and where it occurs is needed before it can reasonably be asserted. Sir Arthur Keith, I submit, does not produce such evidence.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RITCHIE, A. Misuse of the Term 'Evolution'. Nature 157, 879 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1038/157879b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/157879b0