Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

An evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of energy expenditure measured by heart rate and the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate for identifying mis-reporting of energy intake by adults and children: a retrospective analysis

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 57, pages 455–463 (2003)Cite this article

An Erratum to this article was published on 08 May 2003

Abstract

Objective: To identify adults and children as under- (UR), acceptable (AR), or over-reporters (OR) of energy intake (EI) using energy expenditure measured by doubly labelled water (DLW) (EEDLW), and to use this as a reference to determine the sensitivity and specificity of (i) EE measured by heart rate (EEHR), and (ii) the Goldberg cut-off technique for classifying subjects into the same categories.

Design: Retrospective analysis of a dataset comprising concurrent measurements of EEDLW, EEHR, basal metabolic rate (BMR), and EI by weighed record (EIWR) on 14 adults and 36 children. EI by diet history (EIDH) was also measured in the children only. EIWR:EEDLW provided the reference definition of subjects as UR, AR or OR. Three strategies for classifying mis-reporters based on EEHR and Goldberg cut-offs were then explored. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated respectively as the proportion of UR and non-UR correctly identified.

Results: Approximately 80% of all subjects were AR. For EIWR and EIDH respectively, the sensitivity of EEHR was 0.50 and 1.00, and specificity was 0.98 and 1.00. Although designating subjects as having low, medium or high activity levels (EEHR:BMRmeas) and calculating cut-offs based on appropriate WHO physical activity level PALs did not change sensitivity, specificity dropped to 0.98 (EIWR) and 0.97 (EIDH). Cut-offs based on a PAL of 1.55 reduced sensitivity to 0.33 (EIWR) and 0.00 (EIDH), but specificity remained unchanged. The sensitivity of all cut-offs based on physical activity level (PALs) for EIWR was 0.50 (adults) and 0.25 (children).

Conclusions: If the precision of EEHR was improved, it may be useful for identifying mis-reporters of EI.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bingham, S (1987). The dietary assessment of individuals; methods, accuracy, new techniques and recommendations. Nutr. Abstr. Rev., 57, 705–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, AE, Prentice, AM, Goldberg, GR, Jebb, SA, Bingham, SA, Livingstone, MBE & Coward, WA (1993). Measurements of total energy expenditure provide insights into the validity of dietary measurements of energy intake. J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 93, 572–579.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black, AE (1997). Under-reporting of energy intake at all levels of energy expenditure: evidence from doubly labelled water studies. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 56, 121A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, AE (1999). Small eaters or under-reporters?. InProgress in Obesity Research, ed. G Ailhaud & B Guy-Grand pp223–228, Paris: John Libbey

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, AE (2000a). Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord., 24, 1119–1130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black, AE (2000b). The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 54, 395–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black, AE & Cole, TJ (2000). Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by doubly-labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 54, 386–394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black, AE, Prentice, AM & Coward, WA (1986). Use of food quotients to predict respiratory quotients for the doubly-labelled water method of measuring energy expenditure. Hum. Nutr. Clin. Nutr., 40C, 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, AE, Bingham, SA, Johansson, G & Coward, WA (1997). Validation of dietary intakes of protein and energy against 24 hour urinary N and DLW energy expenditure in middle aged women and retired men: comparison with validation against presumed energy requirements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 51, 405–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briefel, RR, Sempos, CT, McDowell, MA, Chien, S & Alaimo, K (1997). Dietary methods research in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: under-reporting of energy intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 65, S1203–S1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, KE & Lambert, EV (1999). Validation of a food frequency questionnaire in older South Africans. S.A. Med. J., 89, 184–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coward, WA (1988). The doubly-labelled-water (2H2 18O) method: principles and practice. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 47, 209–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, JH, Zock, PL, Mensink, RP & Katan, MB (1994). Underestimation of energy intake by 3-d records compared with energy intake to maintain body weight in 269 nonobese adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 60, 855–860.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO/WHO/UNU (1985). University. Report of a joint expert consultation. Energy and protein requirements, WHO Technical Report Series no. 724 Geneva: WHO

  • Fogelholm, M, Männisto, S, Vartiainen, E & Pietinen, P (1996). Determinants of energy balance and overweight in Finland 1982 and 1992. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord., 20, 1097–1104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, GR, Black, AE, Jebb, SA, Cole, TJ, Murgatroyd, PR, Coward, WA & Prentice, AM (1991). Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology. 1. Derivation of cut-off values to identify under-recording. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 45, 569–581.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goris, AHC & Westerterp, KR (1999). Underreporting of habitual food intake is explained by undereating in highly motivated lean women. J. Nutr., 129, 878–882.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, P, Harvey, PJW & Marks, GC (1993). An evaluation of energy intake in the 1983 Australian National Dietary Survey of Adults. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 47, 604–606.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • International Dietary Energy Consultative Group (IDECG) (1990). The doubly-labelled water method for measuring energy expenditure: technical recommendations for human applications. ed. AM Prentice Vienna: IAEA/IDECG NAHRES-4

  • Johnson, RK, Goran, MI & Poehlman, ET (1994). Correlates of over- and underreporting of energy intake in healthy older men and women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 59, 1286–1290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Körtzinger, I, Bierwag, A, Mast, M & Müller, MJ (1997). Measurements of energy intake using a 7-day dietary record and a diet history in non-obese subjects. Ann. Nutr. Metab., 41, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafay, L, Basdevant, A, Charles, M-A, Vray, M, Balkau, B, Borys, J-M, Eschwege, E & Romon, M (1997). Determinants and nature of dietary underreporting in a free-living population: the Fleurbaix Laventie Ville-Santé (FLVS) Study. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord., 27, 567–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, MBE, Prentice, AM, Coward, WA, Ceesay, SM, Strain, JJ, Mckenna, PG, Nevin, GB, Barker, ME & Hickey, RJ (1990a). Simultaneous measurement of free-living energy expenditure by the doubly labeled water method and heart-rate monitoring. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 52, 59–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, MBE, Prentice, AM, Strain, JJ, Coward, JJ, Black, AE, Barker, ME, McKenna, PG & Whitehead, RG (1990b). Accuracy of weighed dietary records in studies of diet and health. Br. Med. J., 300, 708–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, MBE, Coward, WA, Prentice, AM, Davies, PSW, Strain, JJ, McKenna, PG, Mahoney, CA, White, JA, Stewart, CM & Kerr, MJ (1992a). Daily energy expenditure in free-living children: comparison of heart-rate monitoring with the doubly labeled water (2H2 18O) method. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 56, 343–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, MBE, Prentice, AM, Coward, WA, Strain, JJ, Black, AE, Davies, PSW, Stewart, CM, McKenna, PG & Whitehead, RG (1992b). Validation of estimates of energy intake and diet history in children and adolescents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 56, 29–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M, Black, AE, Morris, JA & Cole, TJ (1989). Between- and within-subject variation in nutrient intake from infancy to old age: estimating the number of days required to rank dietary intake with desired precision. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 50, 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, GM, Paul, AA, Cole, TJ & Wadsworth, MEJ (1997). Characteristics of the low-energy reporters in a longitudinal national dietary survey. Br. J. Nutr., 77, 833–851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pryer, J, Vrijheid, M, Nichols, R, Kiggins, M & Elliott, P (1997). Who are the ‘Low energy reporters’ in the dietary and nutritional survey of British adults?. Int. J. Epidemiol., 26, 146–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, E, Bosaeus, I & Steen, B (1997). Evaluation of energy intake estimated by a diet history in three free-living 70 year old populations in Gothenburg, Sweden. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 51, 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeller, DA (1990). How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake?. Nutr. Rev., 48, 373–379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, WN, Schofield, C & James, WPT (1985). Basal metabolic rate. Hum. Nutr. Clin. Nutr., 39C, (Suppl 1) S1–S96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speakman, JR (1997). Doubly Labelled Water: Theory and Practice. London: Chapman and Hall

  • Torun, B, Davies, PSW, Livingstone, MBE, Paolisso, M, Sackett, & Spurr, GB (1996). Energy requirements and dietary energy recommendations for children and adolescents 1 to 18 years. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 50, (Suppl 1) S37–S81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, S, Kroke, A, Klipstein-Grobusch, K & Boeing, H (1997). Obesity as a major determinant of underreporting in a self-administered food frequency questionnaire: results from the EPIC-Potsdam Study. Z. Ernahrungswiss, 36, 229–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the subjects who took part in these studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northern Ireland Centre for Diet and Health, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Co Londonderry, Northern Ireland, UK

    M B E Livingstone, P J Robson, J M W Wallace, M C McKinley, J J Strain & P G McKenna

  2. 9 Birch Close, Cambridge, UK

    A E Black

  3. MRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK

    W A Coward

Authors
  1. M B E Livingstone
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P J Robson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A E Black
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W A Coward
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J M W Wallace
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M C McKinley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J J Strain
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. P G McKenna
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Guarantor: Dr M B E Livingstone.

Contributors: MBEL was the principal author and was responsible for executing the original adult and child cohorts. PJR participated in the conceptualisation, data analysis, drafting and critical review of the manuscript. AEB formulated the specific hypothesis and critically reviewed the manuscript. WAC was responsible for over-seeing the original doubly labelled water analysis and critically reviewed the manuscript. JMWW, McMcK, JJS and PGMcK participated in conceptualisation and helped with the drafting and critical review of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M B E Livingstone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Livingstone, M., Robson, P., Black, A. et al. An evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of energy expenditure measured by heart rate and the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate for identifying mis-reporting of energy intake by adults and children: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 455–463 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601563

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601563

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links