Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

[Letter to Editors]

Abstract

THREE further references to work on Dichroa febrifuga can be added to those quoted above : they are Tonkin and Work, Nature, 156, 630 (1945) ; Cheng Fang Tsu, J. Trop. Med. and Hyg., 75 (April, 1947) ; and J. B. Koepfli, J. F. Mead and J. A. Brockman, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 69, 1837 (1947). Dr. Koepfli refers to the earlier work of Dr. Jang and directs attention to the disparity in melting point between his own and Dr. Jang‘s active alkaloid. The new results now presented by Dr. Jang do not resolve this difficulty. Dr. Koepfli suggests, however, that, at any rate in leaf, the biological activity is not accounted for by the active alkaloid which he isolated; thus several related bases may be present. It should also be noted that Dr. Koepfli suggested the active principle was a quinazoline derivative, a conclusion which is now reached by Dr. Jang also.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WORK, T. [Letter to Editors]. Nature 161, 401 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1038/161401a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/161401a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing