Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. letters
  3. article
Specific Ionization of Extensive Shower Particles
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Letter
  • Published: 29 October 1949

Specific Ionization of Extensive Shower Particles

  • J. R. PRESCOTT1 

Nature volume 164, page 756 (1949)Cite this article

  • 519 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

IN using ionization chambers to study extensive showers, it is necessary to assume some value for the specific ionization of shower particles in order to convert the number of ions collected (which is the quantity measured by the chamber) to the number of particles passing through the chamber, and hence the shower density. There seems to be no general agreement between different workers as to the best figure to assume for this purpose. A survey of the literature reveals that values range from 50 to 100 ion pairs/cm, for air. Many are in the vicinity of 85 ion pairs/cm. for argon, or its equivalent of about 65 ion pairs/cm. for air or nitrogen. This figure corresponds to the specific ionization averaged over electrons of all energies, including those near the minimum of the ionization loss—energy curve. The average energy of extensive shower particles is in the region of 100 MeV., and it therefore seems reasonable to take a larger value for the specific ionization of such particles. Carmichael1 has, in fact, suggested that discrepancies between the extensive shower spectrum obtained by Geiger-counter methods and that found from the size distribution of large bursts could be partly due to an under-estimation of the sizes of bursts in the latter case for the above reason. Carmichael suggests that a value of specific ionization at least 1·4 times greater is necessary to obtain agreement.

Similar content being viewed by others

Exploring large-scale entanglement in quantum simulation

Article 29 November 2023

Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation study of the secondary radiation fields at the laser-driven ion source LION

Article Open access 24 December 2021

Observing cosmic-ray extensive air showers with a silicon imaging detector

Article Open access 12 October 2023

Article PDF

References

  1. Carmichael, H., Phys. Rev., 74, 1667 (1948).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Corson, D. R., and Brode, R. B., Phys. Rev., 53, 773 (1932).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sen Gupta, R. L., Nature, 146, 65 (1940).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hazen, W. E., Phys. Rev., 67, 269 (1945).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rossi, B., and Greisen, K., Rev. Mod. Phys., 13, 240 (1941).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physics Department, University of Melbourne,

    J. R. PRESCOTT

Authors
  1. J. R. PRESCOTT
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PRESCOTT, J. Specific Ionization of Extensive Shower Particles. Nature 164, 756 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/164756a0

Download citation

  • Issue date: 29 October 1949

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/164756a0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Research Analysis
  • Careers
  • Books & Culture
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Current issue
  • Browse issues
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Staff
  • About the Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Our publishing models
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • History of Nature
  • Send a news tip

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature (Nature)

ISSN 1476-4687 (online)

ISSN 0028-0836 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing