Abstract
This study compares harvest and hematological recovery data of 100 lymphoma patients who underwent BM harvest either after a short course of G-CSF (16 μg/kg for 3 days) (n = 57) or in steady-state conditions (n = 43). G-CSF allowed the attainment of a significantly higher median number of total nucleated cells × 108/kg (4.4, range 1.4–17, vs 2.1, range 0.6–4.2; P < 0.0001), mononuclear cells × 108/kg (0.55, range 0.20–1.4, vs 0.41, range 0.15–0.76, P < 0.0001) and cfu-gm/ml (310, range 10–5500, vs 80, range 10–3800, P = 0.008), with lower volumes of blood collected (17.5 ml/kg, range 8–31 vs 21.0, range 15–30, P = 0.0001). Hematological recovery was faster in patients who received pre-treated BM (median time to PMN >0.5 × 109/l and to platelets >20 × 109/l was 12, range 10–14, and 13, range 10–18, days, respectively) than in those autotransplanted with steady-state BM (median time to PMN >0.5 × 109/l and to platelets >20 × 109/l 13, range 10–18 and 14, range 10–20 days, respectively, P = 0.004 and P = 0.01). Transfusional requirement was significantly different and patients of the G-CSF group needed shorter hospitalization (17 days, range 12–24, vs 20 days, range 14–32; P = 0.02). These data suggest that treating patients with G-CSF before BM harvest improves the quality of the harvest and accelerates engraftment and hematological recovery.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Damiani, D., Grimaz, S., Infanti, L. et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: effect of a brief course of G-CSF on harvest and recovery. Bone Marrow Transplant 24, 757–761 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1701979
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1701979