Abstract
Multi-cycle high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (HDC-ASCS) may improve the results obtained with single-cycle HDC-ASCS in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the tolerability and efficacy of additional cycles of HDC-ASCS in patients selected using standard eligibility criteria for single cycle HDC-ASCS is uncertain. Twenty-nine patients with MBC and a CR or PR to induction chemotherapy were selected by standard institutional eligibility criteria for single-cycle HDC-ASCS. Cycle 1 HDC-ASCS (cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2; mitoxantrone 70 mg/m2; carboplatin 800 mg/m2) was followed by a planned second cycle (etoposide 1.6 g/m2; thiotepa 800 mg/m2; carboplatin 800 mg/m2 modulated by tamoxifen 120 mg/m2/day × 5 days) with a median interval of 3.2 months. CR rate was 20% after induction chemotherapy and 33% and 54% after HDC cycles I and II, respectively. Sixteen patients (55%) failed to complete HDC cycle II within 200 days because of disease progression, toxicity, inadequate stem cell collection, insurance denials or patient choice. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all 29 patients entered is 301 days from date of HDC cycle I and actuarial PFS at 2 years is 35%. For the 13 patients who received the two cycles of HDC-ASCS, actuarial PFS at 2 years was 54% (P = NS compared to those receiving only one cycle). These data show that a second cycle of full-dose intensity HDC-ASCS may increase the proportion of patients with MBC that achieve CR and may increase PFS. However, a large proportion of patients that complete HDC-ASCS cycle I may fail to proceed to cycle II in a timely fashion. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 519–524.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S et al. Cancer statistics 1997 CA Cancer J Clin 1997 47: 5–27
Clark G, Sledge GW, Osborne CK et al. Survival from first recurrence: relative importance of prognostic factors in 1015 breast cancer patients J Clin Oncol 1987 5: 55–61
Mick R, Begg CB, Antman K et al. Diverse prognosis in metastatic breast cancer: who should be offered alternative initial therapies? Breast Cancer Res Treat 1989 13: 33–38
Peters WP, Shpall EJ, Jones RB et al. High-dose combination alkylating agents with bone marrow support as initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer J Clin Oncol 1988 6: 1368–1376
Vincent MD, Powles TJ, Coombes RC, McElwain TJ . Late intensification with high-dose melphalan and autologous bone marrow support in breast cancer patients responding to conventional chemotherapy Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1988 21: 255–260
Williams SF, Mick R, Desser R et al. High-dose consolidation therapy with autologous stem cell rescue in stage IV breast cancer J Clin Oncol 1989 7: 1824–1830
Dunphy FR, Spitzer G, Buzdar AU et al. Treatment of estrogen receptor-negative or hormonally refractory breast cancer with double high-dose chemotherapy intensification and bone marrow support J Clin Oncol 1990 8: 1207–1216
Kennedy MJ, Beveridge RA, Rowley SD et al. High-dose chemotherapy with reinfusion of purged autologous bone marrow following dose-intense induction as initial therapy for metastatic breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 1991 83: 920–926
Williams SF, Gilewski T, Mick R, Bitran JD . High-dose consolidation therapy with autologous stem-cell rescue in stage IV breast cancer: follow-up report J Clin Oncol 1992 10: 1743–1747
Antman KH, Rowlings PA, Vaughan WP et al. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America J Clin Oncol 1997 15: 1870–1879
Bezwoda WR, Seymour L, Dansey RD . High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic rescue as primary treatment for metastatic breast cancer: a randomized trial (see comments) J Clin Oncol 1995 13: 2483–2489
Rizzieri DA, Vredenburgh JJ, Chao NJ et al. Long-term disease-free survival for patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing aggressive induction therapy followed by high-dose therapy with hematopoietic support Blood 1998 92: 323a
Norton L, Simon R . The Norton–Simon hypothesis revisited Cancer Treat Rep 1986 70: 163–169
Philip T, Ladenstein R, Zucker JM et al. Double megatherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced neuroblastoma: the LMCE2 study Br J Cancer 1993 67: 119–127
Ayash LJ, Elias A, Wheeler C et al. Double dose-intensive chemotherapy with autologous marrow and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell support for metastatic breast cancer: a feasibility study J Clin Oncol 1994 12: 37–44
Bitran JD, Samuels B, Klein L et al. Tandem high-dose chemotherapy supported by hematopoietic progenitor cells yields prolonged survival in stage IV breast cancer BoneMarrow Transplant 1996 17: 157–162
McClay EF, Albright KD, Jones JA et al. Tamoxifen modulation of cisplatin cytotoxicity in human malignancies Int J Cancer 1993 55: 1018–1022
McClay EF, Albright KD, Jones JA et al. Tamoxifen delays the development of resistance to cisplatin in human melanoma and ovarian cancer cell lines Br J Cancer 1994 70: 449–452
McClay EF, McClay ME, Jones JA et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of high dose tamoxifen and weekly cisplatin in patients with metastatic melanoma Cancer 1997 79: 1037–1043
Crown J, Norton L . Potential strategies for improving the results of high-dose chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer Ann Oncol 1995 6: 21–26
Ayash LJ, Elias A, Schwartz G et al. Double dose-intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support for metastatic breast cancer: no improvement in progression-free survival by the sequence of high-dose melphalan followed by cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin J Clin Oncol 1996 14: 2984–2992
Ghalie R, Williams S, Valentino LA et al. Tandem peripheral blood progenitor cell transplants as initial therapy for metastatic breast cancer Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 1995 1: 40–46
Honkoop AH, van der Wall E, Feller N et al. Multiple cycles of high-dose doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell support in patients with metastatic breast cancer (see comments) Ann Oncol 1997 8: 957–962
Viens P, Gravis G, Genre D et al. High-dose sequential chemotherapy with stem cell support for non-metastatic breast cancer Bone Marrow Transplant 1997 20: 199–203
Danova M, Perotti C, Mora O et al. Multicyclic dose-intensive chemotherapy with circulating progenitor cell support for high-risk primary breast cancer Oncol Rep 1998 5: 427–429
Hohaus S, Wallwiener D, Martin S et al. Efficacy and toxicity of sequential high-dose therapy with peripheral blood stem cell support in patients with high-risk breast cancer Semin Oncol 1998 25: (Suppl. 4) 7–11; Discussion 45–48
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bashey, A., Corringham, S., Garrett, J. et al. A phase II study of two cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support in patients with metastatic breast cancer who meet eligibility criteria for a single cycle. Bone Marrow Transplant 25, 519–524 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702172
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702172


