Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Relativity and Indeterminacy

Abstract

WITHOUT wishing in any way to disagree with H. Bondi's view1 that “relativity demands a non-deterministic theory”, I would suggest that his final summing-up is somewhat misleading. He says: “The flow of time has no significance in the logically fixed pattern of events demanded by deterministic theory, time being a mere co-ordinate. In a theory of indeterminacy, however, the passage of time transforms statistical expectations into real events”.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bondi, H., Nature, 169, 660 (1952).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ubbelohde, A. R., “Time and Thermodynamics”, 97 (Oxf. Univ. Press, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SCOTT BLAIR, G. Relativity and Indeterminacy. Nature 170, 582 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1038/170582a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/170582a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing