Abstract
THE report of the discussion on botanical teaching held at the British Association meeting this year raises a number of interesting problems1. I cannot agree with Dr. Ashby when he suggests that the specific requirements of potential employers, and, in particular, government departments, should determine the scope and content of honours courses. I have heard similar arguments out here in New Zealand where government departments form the major avenue of employment for the abler students. It is surely our duty to see that students have a sound botanical, rather than a vocational botanical, training.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nature, 170, 770 (1952).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CHAPMAN, V. University Botanical Teaching and Training. Nature 171, 314 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1038/171314a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/171314a0