Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A Test of the ‘Redox’ Hypothesis of Active Ion Transport

Nature volume 178, pages 156–157 (1956)Cite this article

Abstract

THE concept that the electron transfer in the oxidation–reduction reactions of respiration constitutes the driving force for active ion transport has provided the basis for several hypotheses of ion transport1–7. All these have in common the quantitative limitation that no more than four univalent ions can be actively transported per molecule of oxygen consumed, because oxygen can accept just four electrons per molecule in its complete reduction.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedenwold, J. S., and Stiehler, R. D., Arch. Ophth., 20, 761 (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stiehler, R. D., and Flexner, L. B., J. Biol. Chem., 126, 603 (1938).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lundegärdh, H., Ann. Agric. Coll., Sweden, 8, 233 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conway, E. J., and Brady, T. G., Nature, 162, 457 (1948); Science, 113, 270 (1951); Int. Rev. Cytol., 2, 419 (1953); 4, 377 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Crane, E. E., and Davies, R. E., Biochem. J., 43, xlii (1948); 46, 324 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Patterson, W. B., and Stetten, jun., D., Science, 109, 256 (1949).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rehm, W. S., Gastroent., 14, 401 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ussing, H. H., and Zerahn, K., Acta Phys. Scand., 23, 110 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chance, B., and Williams, G. R., Nature, 175, 1120 (1955).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zerahn, K., Acta Phys. Scand., 36, 300 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Davenport, H. W., Fed. Proc., 11, 715 (1952).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lund, E. J., and Stapp, P., in “Bioelectric Fields and Growth”, 235 (edit. by Lund, E. J., University of Texas Press, Austin).

  13. Linderholm, H., Acta Phys. Scand., 27, 97 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Research Council Unit for Research in Cell Metabolism, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford,

    ALEXANDER LEAF & ALAN RENSHAW

  2. the Howard Hughes Medical Institute,

    ALEXANDER LEAF & ALAN RENSHAW

Authors
  1. ALEXANDER LEAF
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. ALAN RENSHAW
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LEAF, A., RENSHAW, A. A Test of the ‘Redox’ Hypothesis of Active Ion Transport. Nature 178, 156–157 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1038/178156a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/178156a0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing