Abstract
IN a recent communication1, P. C. Dodwell raises some doubts about the adequacy of a theory of visual shape discrimination in octopus which I outlined in Nature 2. Dodwell makes four points: (1) He thinks it would be difficult to devise an analysing mechanism which would analyse relative differences in rates of firing at different points over a row of neurons: such a mechanism is necessary on my theory to explain the discrimination of certain figures (for example, a square and a circle). (2) He maintains that the theory fails to account for discrimination of shape irrespective of the locus of excitation on the retina. (3) He writes: “the reason for postulating the array of cells [in the optic lobes] becomes obscure, because … the analyser … should enable it to deal directly with information from the retina”. (4) He maintains that a theory of shape discrimination which he is putting forward overcomes the difficulties inherent in my own theory by transforming a spatial pattern into a temporal pattern.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dodwell, P. C., Nature, 179, 1088 (1957).
Sutherland, N. S., Nature, 179, 11 (1957).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SUTHERLAND, N. Shape Discrimination in the Octopus. Nature 179, 1310 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1038/1791310a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1791310a0


