Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A Simple and Safe Procedure for the Removal of Holotrich Ciliates from the Rumen of an Adult Fistulated Sheep

Abstract

DURING recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the role of the rumen ciliate protozoa in ruminant nutrition, particularly with regard to the fermentative activity of the holotrich protozoa which contribute to the production of lactic and volatile fatty acids1,2. It has, however, become evident that further progress in this direction cannot be made until the contribution of each component species of the rumen microfauna can be studied separately both in vitro and in vivo. Attempts to cultivate the rumen ciliates in vitro have hitherto not met with outstanding success. Gutierrez3 managed to separate the two holotrich genera in vitro but only to give a limited yield. The differences in fermentation reactions in vitro found by Gutierrez between Isotricha Stein and Dasytricha Schuberg (cf. Oxford2) seem to justify attempts to establish single species of holotrichs in vivo unmixed with other species. A method is required which would be as effective as, but less drastic than, the use of prolonged starvation and copper sulphate administration4. This objective has so far been reached by us in the one sheep used, to the extent that all three species of holotrichs and the large oligotrichs originally present were removed, leaving only the smaller oligotrich Diplodinium dentatum Stein and a few Entodinia spp. Following this, Dasytricha ruminantium has successfully been reestablished in the rumen so that fairly large ‘pure’ samples of this organism in the living state can now be obtained for in vitro studies, by the normal separation process of Heald, Oxford and Sugden5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hungate, R. E., “Biochemistry and Physiology of Protozoa”, 2, edit. by Hutner, S. M., and Lwoff, A. (Academic Press, New York,1955).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oxford, A. E., Parasitol. Rev., 4, 569 (1955).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gutierrez, J., Biochem. J., 60, 516 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, E. R., Schulz, J. A., and Emmerson, M. A., Iowa State Coll. J. Sci., 4, 215 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heald, P. J., Oxford, A. E., and Sugden, B., Nature, 169, 1055 (1952).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hill, K. J., Quart. J. Exp. Physiol., 40, 32 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MARGARET EADIE, J., OXFORD, A. A Simple and Safe Procedure for the Removal of Holotrich Ciliates from the Rumen of an Adult Fistulated Sheep. Nature 179, 485 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1038/179485a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/179485a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing