Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rejection of the Peroxide Accumulation Hypothesis of Isoniazid Action

Abstract

FROM three quite different lines of investigation it has been postulated that isoniazid kills tubercle bacilli through the intracellular accumulation of hydrogen peroxide1–3. In Micrococcus lysodeikticus, which contains an exceptionally high concentration of catalase, Chance has been able to demonstrate a peroxidase–catalase complex and to show that the peroxide concentration is controlled by the presence of suitable oxygen acceptors within the cell or added externally4. Sensitive though it is, Chance's spectro-photometric method would be difficult to apply to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which has a very low catalase activity5, and direct chemical determination of intracellular peroxide does not seem possible. It seemed reasonable, however, to test the theory of peroxide accumulation in the presence of isoniazid by growing the bacilli in an excess of a stable exogenous oxygen acceptor capable of penetrating the osmotic barrier of the cell but not inhibiting cell growth. Sodium nitrite appears to fulfil all the requirements in that it reduces free peroxide and reacts rapidly with the catalase–peroxide complex, both in vitro6 and intracellularly4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knox, J. Gen. Microbiol., 12, 191 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Winder, Amer. Rev. Tuberc., 73, 779 (1956).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maher, Speyer and Levine, Amer. Rev. Tuberc., 75, 517 (1957).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chance, Science, 116, 202 (1952).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Finlayson and Edson, Trans. Roy. Soc. N. Z., 77, 284 (1949).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chance, J. Biol. Chem., 182, 649 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schaefer, Amer. Rev. Tuberc., 69, 125 (1954).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rider and Mellon, Indust. Eng. Chem., Anal. Edit., 18, 96 (1946).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell and Moyle, 6th Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol., 158 (1956).

  10. Hughes, Brit. J. Exp. Path., 32, 97 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HOLMES, I., RUBBO, S. Rejection of the Peroxide Accumulation Hypothesis of Isoniazid Action. Nature 181, 1203 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1038/1811203a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1811203a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing