Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Value of π and the Old Testament

Abstract

MANY recent authors of texts containing an account of the historical development of the numerical value of π write under the misapprehension that in the Old Testament its apparent value is 3. Concerning this value, Prof. E. T. Bell writes1: “This approximation to π is famous for its occurrence in the Old Testament”. Quoting 2 Chron. 4, 2, Prof. L. Hogben deduces2 “The ancient Hebrews were content with taking π as 3”. The late Prof. G. H. Hardy could scarcely have examined his two quotations, otherwise he would not have made the blunt observation3: “It is stated in the Bible that π = 3”. P. Ehibreil quotes4 1 Kings 7, 23, and contrasts the approximation with Shanks's value of π to 707 decimal places. Quoting 2 Chron. 4, 2, Prof. T. Dantzig comments5 that this description indicates that the Jews held that π is equal to three. Very recently, Archbold quotes6 Dubreil that the Bible gives the value of π as 3, thereby perpetuating the error in the minds of the next generation of students who read his text. These writers therefore fall into two classes, the first regarding π as actually given by 3, and the second regarding the measurements given as only approximate. Even some Biblical commentators have fallen into similar error; for example, Curtis and Madsen in their commentary7 on 2 Chron. 4, 2 suggest that the numbers are only approximations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell, E. T., “The Development of Mathematics”, 40 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hogben, L., “Mathematics for the Million”, 251 (Allen and Unwin, London, 1940).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hardy, G. H., “A Course of Pure Mathematics”, 70 (Cambridge, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubreil, P., “Les Grands Courants de la Pensée Mathématique”, edit. by le Lionnais, F., 99 (Cahiers du Sud, 1948).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dantzig, T., “Number, the Language of Science”, 113 (Allen and Unwin, London, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Archbold, J. W., “Algebra”, 5 (Pitman, London, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Curtis, E. L., and Madsen, A. A., “The International Critical Commentary; The Books of Chronicles”, 331 (Clark, Edinburgh, 1910).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, W., “A Dictionary of the Bible”, 3, 1172 (Murray, London, 1893).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Montgomery, J. A., and Gehman, H. S., “The International Critical Commentary; The Books of Kings”, 173 (Clark, Edinburgh, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Singer, I., “The Jewish Encyclopedia”, 3. 357 (Funk and Wagnalls, New York, 1925).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HEADING, J. The Value of π and the Old Testament. Nature 184, 78 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1038/184078a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/184078a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing