Abstract
Hubbard and Kropf's explanation of my results is based on the statement that the experiments were “performed in circumstances in which photochemical and thermal processes take place side by side”. The implication here is that irradiation converted the parent visual pigment to an orange photoproduct, and that this photoproduct was unstable and decayed to indicator yellow. This is not so. It was explicitly stated that the orange photoproduct produced by irradiating frog rhodopsin at − 5° C. was thermally stable.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dartnall, H. J. A., J. Physiol., 116, 257 (1952).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BRIDGES, C. Regeneration of Visual Pigments from their Low-temperature Photoproducts. Nature 188, 69 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1038/188069a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/188069a0


