Abstract
IT is generally recognized that in the past decade or so we have seen great advances, which are of inestimable value for our understanding of fundamental biology, in the field which is concerned with proteins, nucleic acids, genes, viruses, antibodies, enzymes, etc. It is gratifying to note that several important bodies which are in a position to influence public policy in scientific matters have singled out this field as one requiring increased support.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WADDINGTON, C. Molecular Biology or Ultrastructural Biology?. Nature 190, 184 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1038/190184a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/190184a0
This article is cited by
-
Best Practices in Microbial Experimental Evolution
Journal of Molecular Evolution (2023)
-
Molecular Biology or Ultrastructural Biology ?
Nature (1961)


