Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. letters
  3. article
Anthropometric Correlations between Adult Brothers
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Letter
  • Published: 30 December 1961

Anthropometric Correlations between Adult Brothers

  • EUGÈNE SCHREIDER1 

Nature volume 192, page 1311 (1961)Cite this article

  • 513 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

ANTHROPOMETRIC measurements have been made on 32 pairs of brothers. All subjects are adult men. The average age of the younger brothers is 32.3 yr., that of older brothers, 39.4. Age differences between members of the same pair vary from 1 to 20 years. The brother–brother correlations are shown in Table 1. Some coefficients are low but, unless below 0.35, they are significant at the 5–1 per cent level. Low coefficients are to be expected because in a panmictic population a brother–brother correlation should not significantly exceed 0.50 (or 0.42 for autosomal dominant characters). Other coefficients are higher but, as for low significant correlations, with two exceptions there is no significant departure from 0.50. For head breadth and cephalic index, correlations are surprisingly high and significantly above 0.50. Such values can be expected if, instead of random mating, there is a fairly high degree of homogamy. In man, assortative mating exists primarily for body-height, secondarily for some characters correlated with stature. In our sample, fraternal correlation for body-height is low and does not differ significantly from 0.50, the limiting value compatible with panmixia. One can guess that assortative mating is directly related to some other anatomical traits, but it is hard to believe that cephalic index, which gives the strongest correlation, can be sexually attractive. A quite different explanation seems to be more credible.

Similar content being viewed by others

Sex and sensitive period differences in potential effects of maltreatment on axial versus radial diffusivity in the corpus callosum

Article 12 January 2022

Heterozygous THBS2 pathogenic variant causes Ehlers–Danlos syndrome with prominent vascular features in humans and mice

Article Open access 04 March 2024

Evaluation of height prediction models: from traditional methods to artificial intelligence

Article 21 September 2023

Article PDF

References

  1. Pearson, K., and Lee, A., Biometrika, 2, 357 (1903). Howells, W., Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 6, 449 (1948). Bowles (1932), quoted by Tanner, J. M., in Clinical Genetics, edit. by Sorsby, A., 160 (Butterworth, London, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire d'Anthropologie Physique, 1 rue René-Panhard, Paris, 13

    EUGÈNE SCHREIDER

Authors
  1. EUGÈNE SCHREIDER
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SCHREIDER, E. Anthropometric Correlations between Adult Brothers. Nature 192, 1311 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1038/1921311a0

Download citation

  • Issue date: 30 December 1961

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1921311a0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Research Analysis
  • Careers
  • Books & Culture
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Current issue
  • Browse issues
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Bluesky
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Staff
  • About the Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Journal Metrics
  • Our publishing models
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Journalistic Principles
  • History of Nature
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Send a news tip

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature (Nature)

ISSN 1476-4687 (online)

ISSN 0028-0836 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing