Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Micromanipulation in the Examination of Rumen Bacteria

Abstract

THE culture of bacteria from single cells isolated by micro-manipulation techniques has been used for some time, but only once (in published reports) has the technique been used in attempts to isolate bacteria from rumen contents1. Some new results using the technique as an adjunct to conventional investigations of rumen bacteria are reported here. The method used was essentially that of Johnstone2, as this is simpler than the oil-chamber method originated by de Fonbrune3, and although most rumen bacteria are non-sporing strict anaerobes it was felt that, provided manipulation was rapid, a brief exposure of the cells to air would not affect their viability. The method of casting the agar block and the design of the manipulation cell were as described by Johnstone2 and the manipulation was observed through a × 40 long working-distance phase-contrast objective. A 2 per cent solution of ‘Oxoid Ionagar’ was found to give the clearest gel, and after cooling for 10 min the agar blocks were kept in the refrigerator for 15–20 min to give a surface of the required humidity. A 1-mm loopful of rumen fluid was streaked down one end of the block and single cells of the desired organism drawn away by means of a glass micro-needle and deposited at least 0.5 cm from other organisms. The positions of the separated organisms were marked by an electrically heated needle2. About 8 cells were separated on one agar block, which was then cut up with a sterile micro-knife to leave the organisms on separate blocks of agar which were transferred to 2 ml. of a suitable medium and incubated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ingram, M., and McGaughey, C. A., Nature, 162, 533 (1948).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnstone, K. I., J. Gen. Microbiol., 9, 293 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. de Fonbrune, P., Technique de micromanipulation (Masson et Cie, Paris, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hobson, P. N., Mann, S. O., and Oxford, A. E., J. Gen. Microbiol., 19, 462 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hobson, P. N., and Mann, S. O., J. Gen. Microbiol., 25, 227 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hobson, P. N., Mann, S. O., and Smith, W., J. Gen. Microbiol., 29, 265 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PURDOM, M. Micromanipulation in the Examination of Rumen Bacteria. Nature 198, 307–308 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/198307a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/198307a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing