Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Eosinophil Leucocyte Reaction to Tricycloquina-zoline-treated Cells and to this Chemical

Abstract

SUBCUTANEOUS implantation of isolated cell suspensions in mice gave a marked local eosinophil leucocyte reaction when the cells were of homologous and heterologous origin, but not when isologous normal cells or tumour cells of either native or foreign origin were used1. Implantation of isologous liver cells prepared from mice treated in vivo with hepatocarcinogenic compounds 3′-methyl-4-dimethyl-aminoazobenzene or o-aminoazotoluene resulted in a marked local eosinophil leucocyte reaction similar to that produced by the inoculation of genetically dissimilar cells2. It was suggested that the tissue specific antigen (TSA) of either foreign (homologous or heterologous) or native (isologous) cells, which had been altered or modified by the carcinogens, acted as ‘foreign’ within the isologous host and thus evoked a local eosinophil leucocyte reaction under these experimental conditions. Tumour cells lacking in TSA3–5 failed to evoke a similar reaction even though there was a much greater genetic diversity between the tumour and the host. Further experiments described here were performed to throw some light on the aforementioned hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goswami, P. K., Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp. Ann. Rep., 439 (1962).

  2. Goswami, P. K., Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp. Ann. Rep. (1962).

  3. Weiler, E., Brit. J. Cancer, 10, 553 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nairn, R. C., Richmond, H. G., McEntergart, M. G., and Fothergill, J. E., Brit. Med. J., ii, 1335 (1960).

  5. Nairn, R. C., Fothergill, J. E., McEntergart, M. G., and Richmond, H. G., Brit. Med. J., i, 1791 (1962).

  6. Kaltenbach, J. P., Exp. Cell Res., 7, 568 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murgatroyd, L. B., and Goswami, P. K., J. Med. Lab. Tech., 19, 398 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baldwin, R. W., Cunningham, G. J., and Partridge, M. W., Brit. J. Cancer, 13, 94 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baldwin, R. W., Palmer, H. C., Parfitt, R. T., Partridge, M. W., Vipond, H. J., and Cunningham, G. J., Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp. Ann. Rep., 418 (1961).

  10. Old, L. J., Boyse, E. A., Clarke, D. A., and Carswell, E. A., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 101, 80 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GOSWAMI, P. Eosinophil Leucocyte Reaction to Tricycloquina-zoline-treated Cells and to this Chemical. Nature 202, 1227–1228 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/2021227a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2021227a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing