Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Intracellular Microbial Urease

Abstract

THE urease reaction has been used as a diagnostic method for a number of groups of bacteria. It is particularly useful in differentiating Proteus species from enteric pathogens1,2 and has also been used to differentiate Brucella suis from B. abortus and B. melitensis3. It also has been suggested that urease activity may serve as an indicator of pathogenic potential and of drug resistance among some groups of bacteria4–6. The urease activity of bacteria can readily be determined by inoculating the organisms on to a number of bacteriological media1,2. Seneca et al.6,7 reported that urease activity was observed in cell-free extracts obtained by sonic oscillation, even in groups characterized as lacking this enzyme by sensitive culture methods. The crude extracts such as were used in those investigations may contain large amounts of compounds which readily yield alkaline products; for example, extracts from enteric bacteria have been shown to produce amines from amino-acids8. Therefore, in order to eliminate spurious results, the more specific method involving reaction of acetylbenzoyl with urea has been used to determine urease activity of cell-free preparations9.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stuart, C. A., Van Stratum, E., and Rustigan, R., J. Bact., 49, 437 (1945).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Christensen, W. B., J. Bact., 52, 461 (1946).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pickett, M. J., Nelson, E. L., and Liberman, J. D., J. Bact., 66, 210 (1953).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vallier, J., and Augagneur, J., C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 155, 1300 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parnas, J., and Mierzejewski, T., Zbl. Bakt., I, Abt. Orig., 168, 572 (1957).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seneca, H., Lattimer, J. K., and Peer, P., Amer. Med. Assoc. Arch. Pathol., 74, 489 (1962).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seneca, H., Peer, P., and Nally, R., Nature, 193, 1106 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Møller, V., Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand., 34, 102 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dickenman, R. C., Crafts, B., and Zak, B., Amer. J. Clin. Pathol., 24, 981 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards, P. R., and Ewing, W. H., Identification of Enterobacteriaceae, second ed., 207 (Burgess Pub. Co., Minneapolis, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JEFFRIES, C. Intracellular Microbial Urease. Nature 202, 930 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/202930a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/202930a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing