Abstract
I BELIEVE Mr. Le Fevre's objections are due to the long-term habits of considering temperature measured by a degree (centigrade, Celsius, Kelvin, Fahrenheit, Rankine, etc.); hence, he feels it is necessary that the temperature should have some type of unit name. There is, of course, nothing wrong with this since, for example, we call the unit of energy, newton-metre, a joule, and power a newton-metre/second or joule/second, a watt. I am only proposing that the temperature be called by what it actually represents, that is a joule/kilomole, in the same manner that pressure is a newton/square metre.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GEORGIAN, J. The Temperature Scale. Nature 203, 1158 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/2031158b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2031158b0
This article is cited by
-
The Temperature Scale
Nature (1966)


