Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Jupiter's Great Red Spot

Abstract

THE great red spot of Jupiter has puzzled astronomers since its discovery in 1857 (or since 1664 if it is identical with the feature seen by Robert Hooke). It is generally conceded to-day that Jupiter is approximately 80 per cent hydrogen by weight1–3, and the best modern evidence does not conflict with the assumption that hydrogen predominates in the atmosphere of Jupiter to the same extent as in the planet's bulk4. It has proved difficult to conceive of an ‘object’ able to ‘float’ in a surfaceless ocean5 of supercritical hydrogen gas. Therefore the suggestion of Hide6 that the red spot might not be a flotation phenomenon at all but rather a ‘Taylor column’ was an intriguing alternative. Unfortunately, it has not been possible as yet to prove hydrodynamically that a Taylor column can be realized in Jupiter's atmosphere; for one does not know enough about the hydrodynamic conditions of the atmosphere (we shall return to this point later). Moreover, certain observed phenomena appear to indicate that the rather restrictive requirements for the existence of a Taylor column are not met by the red spot. Without here going into these arguments, we merely wish to propose a novel and alternative explanation based on a theoretical prediction of J. D. van der Waals7 which has been verified in some detail by Krichevsky and Ziclis8, Kennedy and Takenouchi9 and others.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramsey, W. H., and Miles, B., Mon. Not. Roy. Astro. Soc., 112, 234 (1952).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeMarcus, W. C., Astro. J., 63, 2 (1958).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peebles, P. J. E., Astrophys. J., 140, 328 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Owen, T., Astrophys. J., 141, 444 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DeMarcus, W. C., Mém. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège, Ser. 4, 18 (1956).

  6. Hide, R., Nature, 190, 895 (1956); Mém. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège, Ser. 5, 10, 481 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Onnes, H. Kamerlingh, and Keesom, W. H., Encyklopadie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 1, 481 (Teubner, Leipzig, 1921). The original papers of van der Waals are widely scattered. This article has the necessary bibliographical information.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krichevsky, I. R., and Ziclis, D., Acta Physimchimia U.R.S.S., 18, 264 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy, G. C., and Takenouchi, S., Amer. J. Sci., 262, 1055 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DEMARCUS, W., WILDT, R. Jupiter's Great Red Spot. Nature 209, 62 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/209062a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/209062a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing