Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

On the Combination of an Electron Spin Resonance Spectrometer and a Multichannel Analyser

Abstract

IN a recent communication, Kent and Mallard1 pointed out that the versatility of an electron spin resonance-spectrometer can be considerably improved by combining it with an analogue digital converter and a commercial multichannel analyser as they are commonly used in nuclear spectroscopy. We have used a similar piece of equipment, and have already presented a preliminary report2. The basic technique was introduced by Klein and Barton3. It should be noted that any real improvement is based on the fact that the noise seen in electron spin resonance-spectra is not ‘white noise’. That is to say that the probability for a certain frequency to occur in the noise-spectrum is not equal for all frequencies, but is enhanced for lower values3. It is therefore clear that no higher sensitivity can be achieved if the time constant of the amplifier and the recording time are enhanced above a certain limit being about 100 sec for the time-constant4. The sensitivity is restricted, for example, by instabilities of the whole equipment. This applies to relatively long times of measurement. If the recording time is short, a sampling procedure as described by Kent and Mallard1 is not expected to bring any improvement if the time-constant is correctly adjusted. Thus the sub-division of one measurement into ten single ones appears to offer no advantage and the same result may be obtained by increasing the apparatus time constant or by repeating ten times the recording of the whole spectrum at a higher speed. The basic law of communication theory, namely, that any improvement in signal-to-noise ratio requires an increase in time of measurement, cannot be overcome by any of these methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kent, M., and Mallard, J. R., Nature, 207, 1195 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiefer, J., and Neubacher, H., paper read at the Second Symposium on Electrochemical Methods in Biology, Jena, April 1965 (to be published in Abhandl. Deutsche Akad. Wiss.).

  3. Klein, M. P., and Barton, G. W., Paramagnetic Resonance, edit. by Low, W., 698 (Academic Press, 1963); Rev. Sci. Instrum., 34, 754 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schneider, F. (personal communication).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KIEFER, J., NEUBACHER, H. On the Combination of an Electron Spin Resonance Spectrometer and a Multichannel Analyser. Nature 209, 1343 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/2091343a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2091343a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing