Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Prediction of the Intensity of the Present Sunspot Cycle

Abstract

KING-HELE1 predicted that the intensity of the present sunspot cycle (beginning about late 1964) may resemble the relatively high activity cycles with maxima in 1870 and 1949 and that the solar activity of the forthcoming maximum would reach the level which prevailed in late 1959. This prediction of a fairly high level of sunspot activity for the present cycle can be supported by circumstantial evidence from three periods A.D. 1100–1203, 1724–98 and 1914–64, which have remarkable similarities in various aspects of solar activity, and in terrestrial climate, glacial activity and tree growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. King-Hele, D. G., Nature, 209, 285 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray, J. R., Nature, 205, 440 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Waldmeier, M., The Sunspot Activity in the Years 1610–1960 (Schulthess, Zürich, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schove, D. J., J. Geophys. Res., 60, 127 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bray, J. R. (unpublished compilation).

  6. Stuiver, M., J. Geophys. Res., 66, 273 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bray, J. R., Nature, 209, 1065 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamb, H. H., Rep. Sixth Intern. Congress Quaternary, Warsaw, 1961, 2, Paleoclimatological Section, 291 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Manley, G., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 95, 162 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Manley, G., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 161, 363 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schell, I. I., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 95, 251 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Willett, H. C., Centenary Proc. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 195 (1950).

  13. Willett, H. C., J. Meteor., 8, 1 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schell, I. I., Geograf. Ann., 43, 354 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anon., New Scientist, 22, 38 (1964).

  16. Beschel, R. E., in Geology of the Arctic, edit. by Raasch, G. O., 2, 1044 (Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bray, J. R., and Struik, G. J., Canad. J. Bot., 41, 1245 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawrence, D. B., Amer. Sci., 46, 88 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thorarinsson, S., Geograf. Ann., 22, part 3 (1940).

  20. Adamenko, V. N., J. Glaciol., 4, 449 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRAY, J. Prediction of the Intensity of the Present Sunspot Cycle. Nature 210, 929 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/210929a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/210929a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing