Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sensory Information necessary for the Size–Weight Illusion

Abstract

IT has been suggested1,2, and repeated in textbooks3, that the size–weight illusion is due to differences in muscle tension while weights are being lifted. A large object is lifted with more initial force than a small object, and is judged lighter than a smaller object of the same weight because it can be raised more easily. Several authors4–8 have investigated the differences in muscular effort which accompany errors of weight judgment, but the reports are inconsistent. (Some of these studies1,5,6 were concerned with the “time error” rather than the size-weight illusion.) If certain tension changes were firmly established this would not be sufficient evidence that they were the cause of the illusion: both might be caused by some other factor. The illusion can be a result of pressure without lifting9,10. Uznadze10 demonstrated this by placing pyramids of equal base areas, but different heights, on an arm at rest. I also found that the illusion was experienced to its normal extent when the weights were hung by wire loops from a supported hand11.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Müller, G. E., and Schumann, F., Arch. Ges. Physiol., 45, 37 (1889).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Claparède, E., Arch. de Psychol., 1, 69 (1902).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Woodworth, R. S., and Schlosberg, H., Experimental Psychology, 227 (Methuen, London, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loomis, H. N., Psychol. Monog., 8, 334 (1907).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Payne, B., and Davis, R. C., J. Exp. Psychol., 27, 227 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman, G. L., and Sharp, L. H., J. Exp. Psychol., 29, 23 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bzhalava, I. T., Voprosy Psikhologii, 4, 42 (1958), trans. in Recent Soviet Psychology, edit. by O'Connor, N. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Werber, M., and King, D. J., J. Gen. Psychol., 66, 85 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bochorishvili, A. A., Bull. Tbilisi Univ., 3 (1927, cited by Bzhalava, 1958).

  10. Uznadze, D., Psychol. Forsch., 14, 366 (1931).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross, H. E., The Effect of Apparent versus Physical Stimulus Magnitude upon Sensory Discrimination (unpublished thesis, Cambridge Univ., 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howard, I. P., Durham Res. Rev., 1, 47 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fischel, H., Zeit. Psychol., 98, 342 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROSS, H. Sensory Information necessary for the Size–Weight Illusion. Nature 212, 650 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/212650a0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/212650a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing