Abstract
IN a recent communication, Davies and Muir1 pointed out that the experimental results from six independent studies of the retention of particles in the human respiratory system fall into two groups, the results of one group indicating higher values for the deposition than the other. They have attempted to explain this difference by suggesting that in two of these investigations2,3 errors were introduced by the experimental method, whereby the exhaled air was sampled continuously, including during the inhalation period. They said that there was an inaccuracy because the last part of the exhaled air, which had penetrated deeper into the lungs, contained fewer particles than the average. This may be so, but Davies and Muir give a false estimate of the magnitude of the error and do not account for the difference between the two groups of results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Davies, C. N., and Muir, D. C., Nature, 211, 90 (1966).
Dennis, W. L., and Sawyer, K. F., Porton, Tech. Paper No. 190 (Chem. Def. Exp. Est., Porton, 1950).
Van Wijk, A. M., and Patterson, H. S., J. Indust. Hyg. Toxicol., 22, 31 (1940).
Davies, C. N., Ann. Occup. Hyg., 7, 169 (1964).
Davies, C. N., Health Phys., 10, 1029 (1964).
Dennis, W. L., Inhaled Particles and Vapours, 88 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DENNIS, W. Deposition of Inhaled Particles in Human Lungs. Nature 214, 908 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/214908a0
Received:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/214908a0
This article is cited by
-
Deposition of Inhaled Particles in Lungs
Nature (1969)
