Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Possible New Evidence bearing on the Lunar Capture Hypothesis

Abstract

INTEREST in the dynamical history of the Earth–Moon system was stimulated by the calculations of Gerstenkorn1, who deduced that the Moon was originally an independent planet in a solar orbit close to that of the Earth and that it was captured into a highly elliptical retrograde terrestrial orbit of small perigee. The orbit was brought closer and its ellipticity was reduced by tidal interaction until a dramatically close encounter with the Earth flipped the Moon over into a prograde orbit, from which it has receded to its present position under the influence of tidal friction. Gerstenkorn's theory has been favourably reviewed by Alfvén2,3 and very similar dynamical histories are deduced in several more recent calculations4–6. An exact estimate of the time since the very close approach of the Moon is not possible because tidal friction is dependent on several factors, including variable geometry of the oceans. Estimates vary between 2.5 × 109 yr and 1.4 × 109 yr (refs. 1 and 4).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerstenkorn, H., Z. Astrophys., 36, 245 (1955); Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 296, 293 (1967).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alfvén, H., Icarus, 1, 357 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alfvén, H., Science, 148, 476 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. MacDonald, G. J. F., Rev. Geophys., 2, 467 (1964); Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 296, 298 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaula, W. M., Rev. Geophys., 2, 661 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldreich, P., Rev. Geophys., 4, 411 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. MacDonald, G. J. F., Science, 145, 881 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson, D. L., and Archambeau, C. B., J. Geophys. Res., 69, 2071 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper, J. A., and Richards, J. R., Earth and Plan. Sci. Lett., 1, 259 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tatsumoto, M., J. Geophys. Res., 71, 1721 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tatsumoto, M., Science, 153, 1094 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gast, P. W., Tilton, G. R., and Hedge, C., Science, 145, 1181 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patterson, C. C., and Duffield, B., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 27, 1180 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Patterson, C. C., in Recent Researches in the Fields of Hydrosphere, Atmosphere and Nuclear Geochemistry, 257 (Maruzen, Tokyo, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

COOPER, J., RICHARDS, J. & STACEY, F. Possible New Evidence bearing on the Lunar Capture Hypothesis. Nature 215, 1256 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2151256a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2151256a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing