Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Quasar Absorption Lines and Radio Polarization

Abstract

Conway and Gilbert1 have recently reported that the mean linear polarization at 49 cm is lower for quasars with absorption-line spectra than for those with pure emission-line spectra. Although the sample size is small, they “believe that the depolarization is due to Faraday rotation in the same regions as are responsible for the absorption lines”. To examine the effect in more detail we list in Table 1 the mean values of percentage polarization at 11 cm (ref. 2 and unpublished work of Whiteoak, Gardner and Morris) and 6 cm (ref. 3) for the two classes of quasars with z > 1.25, together with those at 49 cm (ref. 1). The sample sizes given in parentheses are small, but it is notable that the differences are comparable at all wavelengths. At 11 cm and 6 cm a consideration of median values, less influenced by individual high polarizations, leads to the same result. We conclude that the polarization difference is due to a lower intrinsic polarization for the absorption-line sources rather than to a larger Faraday depolarization because the latter would increase by at least λ2, that is, by sixty-six times between 6 and 49 cm wavelengths. The difference would contribute in part to the observed decrease of polarization with redshift1, because the relative abundance of absorption-line sources for redshifts exceeding 1.25 is about seven times that at lower redshifts4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conway, R. G., and Gilbert, J. A., Nature, 226, 332 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner, F. F., Whiteoak, J. B., and Morris, D., Austral. J. Phys., 22, 821 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gardner, F. F., Morris, D., and Whiteoak, J. B., Austral. J. Phys., 22, 79 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burbidge, G. R., and Burbidge, E. M., Nature, 222, 735 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GARDNER, F., WHITEOAK, J. Quasar Absorption Lines and Radio Polarization. Nature 227, 585 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/227585a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/227585a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing