Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Negative and Positive Behavioural Contrast in the Same Animals

Abstract

THE reactions of animals to situations that suddenly become more attractive or less attractive have long seemed potentially useful for the evaluation of drugs and other treatments assumed to affect emotional responsivity1. Crespi2,3 reported that rats shifted to a larger (or smaller) amount of reward ran faster (or slower) to the goal in a runway than control rats who were accustomed to the larger (or smaller) amount. But it has usually been difficult to find reliable overshooting or “positive contrast” effects to an increase in reward magnitude, and even the more reliable negative contrast effect (undershooting to a decrease in reward magnitude) has proved troublesome when separate experimental and control groups are used4. Furthermore, the transient character of the effects, even when obtained, makes them inconvenient for the chronic testing of various treatments, such as antidepressant drugs or brain lesions. Finally, recent demonstrations of “behavioural contrast” have depended on somewhat complex multiple schedule situations, not necessarily related to that originally used by Crespi5–7. Here we report a simple technique for the repeated study of both positive and negative effects in the same animals, with results that are stable over weeks of daily testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weiskrantz, L., in Analysis of Behavioral Change (edit. by Weiskrantz, L.) (Harper and Row, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crespi, L. P., Amer. J. Psychol., 55, 467 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crespi, L. P., Psychol. Rev., 51, 341 (1944).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunham, P. J., Psychol. Bull., 69, 295 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reynolds, G. S., J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 4, 57 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Catania, A. C., in Operant Behavior (edit. by Honig, W. K.) (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Terrace, H. S., J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 9, 613 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spence, K. W., Behavior Theory and Conditioning (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1956).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Shanab, M. E., Sanders, R., and Premack, D., Science, 164, 724 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BALTZER, V., WEISKRANTZ, L. Negative and Positive Behavioural Contrast in the Same Animals. Nature 228, 581–582 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/228581a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/228581a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing