Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A Paradox in the Interaction of the Gravitational and Electromagnetic Fields ?

Abstract

RECENTLY Woodward and Yourgrau1 put forward the hypothesis that the influence of gravitation on the propagation of electromagnetic waves depends on the frequency of the radiation. Their starting point is that the light deflexion by the Sun's gravitational field, as found from optical determinations at solar eclipses, appears somewhat larger2,3 than the value predicted by Einstein's theory of gravitation. Lately Muhleman et al.4 and Seielstad et al.5 succeeded in measuring the light deflexion by the Sun at 2.388 GHz and 9.602 GHz. Their results (1.82″ ± 0.2″ and 1.77″ ± 0.2 ″) are in close agreement with the predictions of general relativity. The uncertainty introduced by our limited knowledge of the coronal plasma amounts to about 10 per cent of the relativistic light deflexion4, which, being sufficient to prevent a decision between Einstein's theory and the Brans-Dicke theory, is not enough to make these measurements compatible with the predictions of Woodward and Yourgrau. Their hypothesis (according to formula (2), or (1) and (3))1 gives at 2.388 GHz and 9.602 GHz the tremendous values of 15′ 39″ and 7′ 45″ respectively for the light deflexion (that is, more than 500 times and 200 times the experimental results).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woodward, J. F., and Yourgrau, W., Nature, 226, 619 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mikhailov, A. A., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 119, 593 (1959).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Klüber, H. von, Vistas in Astronomy, 3, 47 (New York, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Muhleman, D. O., Ekers, R. D., and Fomalat, E. B., Phys. Rev. Lett., 24, 1377 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seielstad, G. A., Sramek, R. A., and Weiler, K. W., Phys. Rev. Lett., 24, 1373 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadeh, D., Knowles, S., and Yaplee, B. S., Science, 159, 307 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sadeh, D., Knowles, S., and Au, B., Science, 161, 567 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shapiro, I. I., Pettengill, G. H., Ash, M. E., Stone, M. L., Smith, W. B., Ingalls, R. P., and Brockelman, R. A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 20, 1265 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shapiro, I. I., ESRO Summer School (Interlaken, 1969).

  10. Anderson, J. D., Muhleman, D. O., and Martin, W., Proc. Thirteenth COSPAR Plenary Meeting (Leningrad, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

REINHARDT, M. A Paradox in the Interaction of the Gravitational and Electromagnetic Fields ?. Nature 229, 36 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/229036a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/229036a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing