Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Remanent Magnetization in Meteorites

Abstract

ALTHOUGH the existence of natural remanent magnetization in meteorites has been taken as evidence for a primaeval magnetic field in the original bodies—presumably of asteroidal dimensions—from which meteorites formed1, it seems surprising that an asteroidal core ( 100 km diameter as an upper limit) can sustain convective motions efficient enough to produce the magnetic field, 10−1 to 1 G, required by the NRM measurements2. Moreover, recent data suggest that iron meteorites are not necessarily fragments of a much larger core, as had been supposed, but formed as small bodies embedded in a silicate matrix3. As there is no other obvious internal mechanism for generating NRM, could an external mechanism be responsible? During the early history of the solar system, the magnetic field of the Sun may have been much more intense than it is at present, possibly 100 G (ref. 4), and the rotation of the Sun may have been much more rapid. A recent estimate for solar spin damping by the solar wind gives an e-folding time 2.2×109 yr (ref, 5). There are two mechanisms by which NRM could have been created in meteorites under these conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anders, E., Space Sci. Rev., 3, 583 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stacey, F. D., Lovering, J. F., and Parry, L. G., J. Geophys. Res., 66, 1523 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Urey, H. C., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 131, 199 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoyle, F., and Wickramasinghe, N. C., Nature, 217, 415 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. van den Heuvel, E. P. J., and Conti, P. S., Science, 171, 895 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sonett, C. P., Colburn, D. S., Schwartz, K., and Keil, K., Astrophys. Space Sci., 7, 446 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Butler, R. F., and Cox, A. V., Science, 172, 939 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jain, A. V., and Lipschutz, M., in Meteorite Research (edit. by Millman, P. M.) (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lipschutz, M., in Shock Metamorphism of Natural Materials (edit. by French, B. M., and Short, N. M.) (Mono Book Corp., Baltimore, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graham, R. A., Anderson, D. H., and Holland, J. R., J. Appl. Phys., 38, 223 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Agrell, S. O., Long, J. V. P., and Gilvie, R. E., Nature, 198, 749 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pochtarev, V. I., and Gushova, Ye. G., Geomag, i. Aeronom., 2, 749 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dence, M., in Shock Metamorphism of Natural Materials (edit. by French, B. M., and Short, N. M.) (Mono Book Corp., Baltimore, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MEADOWS, A. Remanent Magnetization in Meteorites. Nature 237, 274 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/237274a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/237274a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing