Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Non-Random Segregation during Mammalian Oogenesis

Abstract

INVESTIGATIONS of the breeding performance and early embryo-genesis of the XO female mouse1,2 by Cattanach3 and Morris4 were difficult to explain because the number of XO females born to XO mothers was considerably less than predicted. Cattanach3 suggested there was either a preferential loss of the chromosome sets lacking an X to the polar bodies during meiosis, or death during early embryonic development. Morris4 and others5,6 concluded that YO was inviable. The proportion of oocytes with and without an X chromosome was determined at metaphase II. The sex-linked Tabby gene was used as a marker in the XO mice, which were of similar stock to those used by Cattanach3 and Morris4. XO females in succeeding generations were mated to +/y and Ta/y males. Ta/O females were superovulated and autopsied 16–20 h after the human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) injection. The freshly ovulated oocytes were liberated from the ampullae and ovarian oocytes from the larger intact follicles. Oocytes at the germinal vesicle stage were cultured for 18–24 h in modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate medium7, after which most reached metaphase II. The metaphase II cells were placed in 1% sodium citrate solution for 10–20 min. Air-dried preparations were made by the method described by Tarkowski8 and stained with 2% Giemsa at pH 7.0 for 45 min. The slides were washed briefly with distilled water, allowed to dry and then dehydrated with xylol and mounted with ‘Clearmount’.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russell, W. L., Russell, L. B., and Gower, J. S., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 45, 554 (1959).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Welshons, W. J., and Russell, L. D., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 45, 560 (1959).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cattanach, B. M., Genet. Res., 3, 487 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morris, T., Genet. Res., 12, 125 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohno, S., Sex Chromosomes and Sex-linked Genes (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1967).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Lyon, M. F., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, 259, 41 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Whittingham, D. G., J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl., 14, 7 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tarkowski, A. K., Cytogenetics, 5, 394 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zimmering, S., Sandler, L., and Nicoletti, B., Ann. Rev. Genet., 4, 409 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rhoades, M. M., Genetics, Princeton, 27, 395 (1942).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Battaglia, E., Caryologia, 17, 245 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seiller, J., Arch. Zellforsch., 15, 249 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wallace, M. E., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, 241, 211 (1958).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KAUFMAN, M. Non-Random Segregation during Mammalian Oogenesis. Nature 238, 465–466 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/238465a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/238465a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing