Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Seasonal Variations in Bone Mineral Content after the Menopause

Abstract

PHOTON absorption techniques for measuring bone mineral content in vivo1 have made possible realistic assessment of short-term sequential changes in skeletal mass in human subjects. Shimmins et al.2, using a photon absorption technique to measure the mineral content of the third metacarpal of human volunteers claimed a reproducibility for the method of ± 3% (1 s.d.). In post-menopausal women there is skeletal wasting resulting in an average fall in bone mineral content of about 1% per year3 (post-menopausal osteoporosis4). Successive measurements of bone mineral content made in a group of post-menopausal women at six-monthly intervals would be expected to show a mean fall of only 0.5% on each occasion. The difference between any two such measurements should be within the reproducibility of the method, ± 3%. Preliminary investigations using this method for confirming the expected reproducibility of the method gave results very much greater than ± 3%, inferring that either gross technical irregularities had appeared or specific biological changes were occurring. A more detailed investigation of the problem revealed some unexpected and interesting results.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cameron, R., and Sorenson, J. A., Science, 142, 230 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shimmins, J., Smith, D. A., Aitken, M., Anderson, J. B., and Gillespie, F. C., Clin. Radiol., 23, 47 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, D. A., Anderson, J. B., Shimmins, J., Speirs, C. F., and Barnett, E., Clin. Radiol., 20, 23 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Albright, F., Smith, P. H., and Richardson, A. M., J. Amer. Med. Ass., 116, 2465 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frost, H. M., J. Clin. Endocr., 22, 631 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, R. W., Rizek, J., and Frame, B., Amer. J. Clin. Nutr., 14, 98 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hess, A. F., and Lundagen, M. A., J. Amer. Med. Ass., 79, 2210 (1922).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bakwin, H., and Bakwin, R. M., Amer. J. Dis. Child., 34, 994 (1927).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

AITKEN, J., ANDERSON, J. & HORTON, P. Seasonal Variations in Bone Mineral Content after the Menopause. Nature 241, 59–60 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/241059a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/241059a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing