Abstract
Regnier and Park1 do not appear fully to have appreciated the significant point that emerged from my finding2 that much higher concentrations of antibiotic-resistant and sensitive coliform organisms were present in specimens of water taken from rivers flowing through urban areas than were present in similar specimens taken from rivers flowing through rural areas. This is that human beings were the main source of the sewage pollution of the rivers and that domestic animals were a comparatively unimportant source. The fact that one cannot differentiate the two kinds of specimens from each other by reference to the ratio of the numbers of resistant and sensitive organisms they contain is therefore irrelevant.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Regnier, A. P., and Park, R. W. A., Nature, 239, 408 (1972).
Smith, H. W., Nature, 228, 1286 (1970).
Smith, H. W., Nature, 234, 155 (1971).
Report, J. Hyg. Camb., 57, 435 (1959).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WILLIAMS SMITH, H. Pollution of Beaches: Reply to Regnier and Park. Nature 242, 276 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/242276a0
Received:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/242276a0