Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Why is the XX Fitter? Evidence Consistent with an Effect of X-heterosis in the Human Female from Sex Ratio Data in Offspring of First Cousin Marriages

Abstract

ALTHOUGH the human female is known to be more viable, on the average, than the human male, the biological mechanisms for this difference are poorly understood. A relevant question is, to what extent does heterozygosity for X-linked loci contribute to survival of the XX female? The advantage accruing to the XX female because of this factor may be defined as X-heterosis1. Most instances of serious X-linked disorders such as haemophilia occur in males, but the total incidence of such severe diseases is relatively small and cannot account for the observed sex differences in age specific mortality rates. It is conceivable that X-heterosis is relatively insignificant in the total population, and that the bulk of the observed sex difference is attributable to physiological factors that are a consequence of sex differentiation (for example, the apparent oestrogen-sparing effect on coronary heart disease) and/or to psycho-cultural factors that may pertain to diminished exposure of woman to environmental hazards (for example, industrial pollutants).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hook, E. B., Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 21, 290 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson, C. E., Mann, J. D., and Schull, W. J., Nature, 222, 445 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schull, W. J., Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 10, 294 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schull, W. J., and Neel, J. V., Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 15, 106 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schull, W. J., Komatsu, I., Nagano, H., and Yamamoto, M., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 59, 671 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schull, W. J., Furusho, J., Yamamoto, M., Nagano, H., and Komatsu, I., Humangenetik, 9, 294 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schull, W. J., Nagano, H., Yamamoto, M., and Kamatsu, I., Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 22, 239 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Taeuber, I., The Population of Japan (Princeton University Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HOOK, E., SCHULL, W. Why is the XX Fitter? Evidence Consistent with an Effect of X-heterosis in the Human Female from Sex Ratio Data in Offspring of First Cousin Marriages. Nature 244, 570–573 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/244570a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/244570a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing