Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Nuclear segregation in Bacillus subtilis

Abstract

JACOB, BRENNER AND CUZIN1 suggested that prokaryote nuclear segregation was achieved by cell surface extension between surface sites to which the chromosome is permanently attached (Fig. 1a). Their model (model A) showed nuclear segregation occurring in newly divided cells, with all surface extension in one cycle occurring between the nuclei. Thus at cell division, nuclei would be arranged symmetrically in the half cell but asymmetrically during the interdivisional period. If nuclear segregation occurs during mid-cycle and cell extension is continuous throughout the cycle, the nucleus cannot reach a symmetrical position (that is at 25% of the cell length) by the end of the cycle relying solely on length extension. To overcome these difficulties, Clark2 proposed that the nucleus is always located at the junction of old and new membranes with growth occurring on one side of the nucleus (model B, Fig. 1b). At nuclear segregation, the growing point divides allowing growth of the cell envelope between the nuclei as shown in Fig. 1b. Nuclei remain attached at the site of envelope extension, giving a newborn cell with an asymmetrically arranged nucleus. Donachie and Begg3 have presented evidence for terminal growth regions in slow growing cells as predicted by Clark's model. A third possibility is that the nucleus is located centrally in new born cells and moves to a position at the centre of a half cell at the time of segregation (model C, Fig. 1c). These, and other possibilities, can be explored by determining the position of nuclei in relation to cell length in exponential phase cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacob, F., Brenner, S., and Cuzin, F., Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol., 28, 329 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, D. J., Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol., 33, 823 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Donachie, W. D., and Begg, K. J., Nature, 227, 1220 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sargent, M. G., J. Bact., 116, 736 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paulton, R. J. L., J. Bact., 104, 762 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mendelson, N. H., Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol., 33, 313 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, S., and Helmstetter, C. E., J. molec. Biol., 31, 519 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SARGENT, M. Nuclear segregation in Bacillus subtilis. Nature 250, 252–254 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/250252a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/250252a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing