Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Why didn't Gregor Mendel find linkage?

Abstract

IT is quite often said that Mendel was very fortunate not to run into the complication of linkage during his experiments. He used seven genes and the pea has only seven chromosomes. Some have said that had he taken just one more, he would have had problems. This, however, is a gross oversimplification. The actual situation, most probably, is shown in Table 1. This shows that Mendel worked with three genes in chromosome 4, two genes in chromosome 1, and one gene in each of chromosome 5 and 7. It seems at first glance that, out of the 21 dihybrid combinations Mendel theoretically could have studied, no less than four (that is, a–i, v–fa, v–le, fa–le) ought to have resulted in linkages. As found, however, in hundreds of crosses and shown by the genetic map of the pea1, a and i in chromosome 1 are so distantly located on the chromosome that no linkage is normally detected. The same is true for v or le on the one hand, and fa on the other, in chromosome 4. This leaves v–le, which ought to have shown linkage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blixt, S., in Handbook of Genetics, 2 (edit. by King, R. C.), (Plenum, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BLIXT, S. Why didn't Gregor Mendel find linkage?. Nature 256, 206 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/256206a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/256206a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing