Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Purported difference between human T- and B-cell surface morphology is an artefact

Abstract

BECAUSE of the previous inability to detect differences in lymphocyte morphology by light or transmission electron microscopy1, reports that B and T lymphocytes examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) could be identified by their distinctive surface morphology have been met with interest2–6. In these studies, most ‘villous’ cells were identified as B lymphocytes and T lymphocytes were described as ‘relatively smooth’. Some investigators have reported that T lymphocytes are more villous than B lymphocytes7–9; others, however, have not detected a difference in surface form among human10,11, or murine lymphocytes12–14. The present study demonstrates that the collection and fixation technique used in those studies that initially described the dichotomy in lymphocyte SEM morphology2–5, artefactually produces smooth cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Douglas, S. D., Rev. exp. Path., 10, 41–114 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Polliack, A., et al., J. exp. Med., 138, 607–624 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Polliack, A., et al., J. exp. Med., 140, 146–158 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Polliack, A., Hämmerling, U., Lampen, N., and DeHavern, E., Eur. J. Immun., 5, 32–39 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Polliack, A., and De Harven, E., Clin. Immun. Immunopath., 3, 412–430 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, P. S., Cooper, A. G., and Wortis, H. H., New Engl. J. Med., 289, 548–551 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Linthicum, D. S., Sell, S., Wagner, R. M., and Trefts, P., Nature, 252, 173–175 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kay, M. M. B., et al., Clin. Immun. Immunopath., 2, 301–309 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kay, M. M. B., Nature, 254, 424–426 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander, E. L., and Wetzel, B., Science, 188, 732–734 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Galey, F. R., Prchal, J. T., Amromin, G. D., and Jhurani, Y., New Engl. J. Med., 290, 690 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nemanic, M. K., Carter, D. D., Pitelka, D. R., and Wofsy, L., J. Cell Biol., 64, 311–321 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Molday, R. S., Dreyer, W., Renbaum, A., and Yen, S. P. S., J. Cell Biol., 64, 75–88 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baur, P., Thurman, G., and Goldstein, A., J. Immun., 115, 1375–1380 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders, S., Alexander, E., and Braylan, R., J. Cell Biol., 67, 476–480 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Boyum, A., Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest., 21, Suppl. 97, 1–109 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jaffe, E., Shevach, E., Frank, M., Berard, C., and Green, I., New Engl. J. Med., 290, 813–819 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dickler, H. B., and Kunkel, H. G., J. exp. Med., 136, 191–196 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Arbeit, R., Henkart, P., and Dickler, H. B., in In Vitro Methods in Cell Mediated Immunity, 2 (edit. by Bloom, B., and David, J.) (Academic, New York, in the press).

  20. Anderson, T. F., Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 13, 130–134 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, P. S., Wallach, D. F. H., and Tsai, S., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 2492–2496 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Braylan, R. C., et al., Cancer Res. (in the press).

  23. Wilson, J. D., Pang, G. T. M., and Gavin, J. B., Pathology, 6, 337–342 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin, P. S., and Wallach, D. F. H., Science, 184, 1300–1301 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Padnos, M., Nature, 259, 218–220 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wetzel, B., Cannon, G. B., Alexander, E. L., Erickson, B. W., and Westbrook, E. W., in Scanning Electron Microscopy (edit. by Johari, O., and Corvin, L), 582–588 (IIT Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Loor, F., and Hagg, L. B., Eur. J. Immun., 5, 854–865 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Alexander, E., and Henkart, P., J. exp. Med., 143, 329–347 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ALEXANDER, E., SANDERS, S. & BRAYLAN, R. Purported difference between human T- and B-cell surface morphology is an artefact. Nature 261, 239–241 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/261239a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/261239a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing