Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Low specific activity of rare allozymes of α-glycerophosphate dehydrogenase in Drosophila

Abstract

ELECTROPHORETIC surveys of Drosophila species1 show that many gene–enzyme systems are essentially monomorphic. Very often, however, one or more populations may contain rare alleles, that is, at frequencies less than 5%. Are these alleles selectively neutral and rare because of historical accidents2 or are they deleterious and maintained in populations only through mutation? The dimeric enzyme α-glycerophosphate dehydrogenase (αGPDH) is a good example of an essentially monomorphic Drosophila gene–enzyme system. Out of the 101 species of Drosophila surveyed thus far for electrophoretic variation of αGPDH (refs 3–5), only D. melanogaster is polymorphic. This polymorphism seems to be maintained by selection with temperature being, or strongly correlated with, the selective agent6–8. Microcomplement fixation experiments indicate that this enzyme is evolving slowly among Drosophila species and has accepted relatively few changes in its structure9. We propose that the rare alleles of the αGPDH locus found in some species (see ref. 5) may be at low frequencies because the products of these alleles (allozymes) are catalytically less efficient than their ‘wild-type’ counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Powell, J. F., Evol. Biol. 8, 79–199 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Robertson, A., Genetics 81, 775–785 (1975).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zouros, E., Nature 254, 446–448 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barker, J. S. F. & Mulley, J. C., Evolution 30, 213–233 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Collier, G. E., Isozyme Bull. 10, (in the press).

  6. Berger, E., Genetics 67, 121–136 (1971).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, F. M. & Schaffer, H. E., Biochem. Genet. 10, 149–163 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, S., Pearcy, R. W. & Berger, E., Biochem. Genet. 13, 175–188 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Collier, G. E. & MacIntyre, R. J., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 684–688 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Collier, G. E. thesis, Cornell Univ. (1976).

  11. Stamatoyannopoulos, G., A. Rev. Genet. 6, 47–70 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger, E., Am. Nat. 110, 823–839 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Collier, G. E., Sullivan, D. T. & MacIntyre, R. J., Biochim. biophys. Acta 429, 316–323 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chovnick, A., Gelbart, W., McCarron, M., Osmond, B., Candido, E. P. M. & Baillie, D. L., Genetics 84, 233–255 (1976).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

COLLIER, G., MACINTYRE, R. Low specific activity of rare allozymes of α-glycerophosphate dehydrogenase in Drosophila. Nature 267, 839–841 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/267839a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/267839a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing