Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Prediction of seed longevity at sub-zero temperatures and genetic resources conservation

Abstract

THE International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) is encouraging the development of an international network of seed banks for the conservation of the genetic resources of the major crop species of the world and their wild relatives1. Most of the species in priority lists show ‘orthodox’ seed characteristics2, that is their longevity is prolonged in a defined manner by a reduction in moisture content (MC) (at least down to 5% MC, fresh weight basis) and temperature3. From a consideration of biological factors and the design and cost of seed storage facilities, IBPGR recommends that orthodox seeds are stored at −18 °C or less and at 5± 1% MC2. It is convenient to aim at −20 °C as the nominal temperature. Because of the accumulation of mutations associated with loss of viability4,5, IBPGR recommends regeneration of stocks (that is growing plants to provide new seeds from the old) when viability has fallen by 5% (ref. 2). To plan ancillary facilities and procedures, it is necessary to estimate regeneration intervals (time taken for viability to fall by 5%) for the major crop species. Such estimates pose three problems: there are genotypically controlled variations in longevity within a species; seed ‘quality’, determined by conditions before harvest and during processing, can affect subsequent longevity; and loss of viability at −20 °C is extremely slow, and so far it has been possible to predict regeneration interval only by questionable extrapolation from more favourable storage conditions5,6. We have examined these problems in barley (Hordeum distichum, L.) and have developed an approach which should make possible more accurate predictions from experiments lasting only 2 yr—even though fresh seed of most species shows no detectable loss of viability during this time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Conservation of Crop Genetic Resources (International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, 1975).

  2. Report of the IBPGR Working Group on Engineering, Design and Cost Aspects of Long-term Seed Storage Facilities (International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, 1976).

  3. Roberts, E. H. Seed Sci. Techn. 1, 499–513 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts, E. H., Abdalla, F. H. & Owen, R. J. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 21, 65–100 (1967). Abdalla, F. H. & Roberts, E. H. Ann. Bot. 32, 119–136 (1968). Abdalla, F. H. & Roberts, E. H. Ann. Bot. 33, 153–167 (1969). Roberts, E. H. Seed Sci. Techn. 1, 515–527 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts, E. H. in Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow (eds Frankel, O. H. & Hawkes, J. G.) 269–295, 316 (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts, E. H. in Viability of Seeds (ed. Roberts, E. H.) 14–58 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis, R. H. thesis, Reading Univ. (1976).

  8. A. Rep. Seventh Lab., Div. Genet., Japan 5–7 (1963) (in Japanese).

  9. Roberts, E. H. Ann. Bot. 24, 12–31 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roberts, E. H. & Abdalla, F. H. Ann. Bot. 32, 97–117 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROBERTS, E., ELLIS, R. Prediction of seed longevity at sub-zero temperatures and genetic resources conservation. Nature 268, 431–433 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/268431a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/268431a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing