Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Inverse relation of survival of lizards with island size and avifaunal richness

Abstract

SMALL islands have fewer species than larger islands or mainlands, and the number of species of very large predators, for example raptorial birds, may be disproportionately lower1,2. This suggests the reasonable but largely untested idea that predation is less important as a determinant of population structure on small islands than on large islands or mainlands, particularly for relatively large potential prey such as songbirds and lizards3–10. We have compared the survival of three species of the lizard Anolis on two islands differing in size and number of predatory bird species. We report here that annual survival in sites identical in diurnal lizard species and nearly so in vegetation structure is smaller, and usually substantially so, on the larger island. In one species, the size distribution of males parallels this difference in survival: lizards are smaller where survival is lower. Sexual differences in survival between the two islands are especially marked in an intensely territorial, polygamous species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lack, D. Darwin's Finches (Cambridge University Press, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diamond, J. M. in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.) 342–444 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlquist, S. Island Life (Natural History Press, New York, 1965); Island Biology (Columbia University Press, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kramer, G. Z. Naturforsch. 1, 700–710 (1946).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cody, M. L. Evolution 20, 174–184 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rand, A. S. & Humphrey, S. S. Proc. U. S. natn. Mus. 125, 1–17 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rand, A. S. & Williams, E. E. Breviora Mus. Comp. Zool. 327, 1–19 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andrews, R. M. thesis, Harvard Univ. (1971); Copeia 1976, 477–482 (1976).

  9. Schoener, T. W. Am. Nat. 104, 155–174 (1970); in Biology of the Reptilia (eds Gans, C. & Tinkle, D. W.) 35–136 (Academic, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lister, B. C. Evolution 30, 659–676 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Paulson, D. Notulae Naturae 394, 1–15 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vaurie, C. Auk 70, 38–48 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McNab, B. Am. Nat. 97, 133–139 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schoener, T. W. Ecology 49, 123–141 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Turner, F. B., Jennrich, R. I. & Weintraub, J. D. Ecology 50, 1076–1081 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwartz, A. & Thomas, R. A Check-list of West Indian Amphibians and Reptiles (Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Schoener, T. W. & Schoener, A. Copeia (in the press 1978).

  18. Schoener, T. W. Am. Natur. 103, 277–313 (1969); Science 185, 27–38 (1975); Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 4169–4172 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruibal, R. & Philibosian, R. Ecology 55, 525–537 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Philibosian, R. Copeia 1975, 428–444 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schoener, T. W. Theor. Pop. Biol. 6, 265–307 (1974); Ecol. Monogr. 45, 233–252 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Howard, R. A. Ecol. Monogr. 20, 318–349 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jennrich, R. I. & Turner, F. B. J. theoret. Biol. 22, 227–237 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SCHOENER, T., SCHOENER, A. Inverse relation of survival of lizards with island size and avifaunal richness. Nature 274, 685–687 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/274685a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/274685a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing