Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Overshoots in planetary bow shocks

Abstract

An overshoot in the magnitude of the magnetic field is shown here to be a consistent feature of supercritical collisionless shocks, Mach number 3, throughout the Solar System. Although the variability of the solar wind at 1 AU allows us to study the Earth's bow shock over a wide range of β, the ratio of thermal pressure to magnetic pressure, the Mach number of the solar wind at 1 AU varies over a relatively narrow range. Data from Jupiter and Saturn allow us to study the bow shock at high Mach numbers rarely, if ever, observed at Earth. These combined planetary data show that the planetary bow shocks, at least as characterized by their overshoots, form part of a continuum, differences being dependent mainly on the varying solar wind conditions at each of the planets. The overshoot magnitude is found to increase both with β and magnetosonic Mach number. However, it is the radial variation of Mach number which causes the overshoot in the jovian and saturnian bow shocks to be much greater than in the terrestrial shock.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sonnerup, B. U. O. J. geophys. Res. 74, 1301 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tidman, D. A. & Krall, N. A. Shock Waves in Collisionless Plasmas (Wiley, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heppner, J. P., Sugiura, M., Skillman, T. L., Ledley, B. G. & Campbell, M. J. geophys. Res. 72, 5417 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Russell, C. T. & Greenstadt, E. W. Space Sci. Rev. 23, 3 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bame, S. J. et al. Space Sci. Rev. 23, 75 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leroy, M. M., Goodrich, C. G., Winske, D., Wu, C. S. & Papadopoulos, K. Geophys. Res. Lett. 8, 1269 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scarf, F. L., Gurnett, D. A. & Kurth, W. S. Nature 292, 747–750 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell, C. T. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Electron. GE–16, 239 (1978).

  9. Russell, C. T., Snare, R. C., Means, J. D. & Elphic, R. C. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing GE–18, 32 (1980).

  10. Russell, C. T., Elphic, R. C. & Slavin, J. A. Nature 282, 815 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, E. J. et al. J. geophys. Res. 85, 5655 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, C., Hoppe, M. & Livesey, W. Overshoots in planetary bow shocks. Nature 296, 45–48 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/296045a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/296045a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing