Abstract
Study design:
Direct observation of a constrained consensus-building process in three culturally independent five-person panels of rehabilitation professionals from the US, Italy and Canada.
Objectives:
To illustrate cultural differences in belief among rehabilitation professionals about the relative importance of alternative functional goals during spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation.
Setting:
Spinal Cord Injury Units in Philadelphia-USA, Rome-Italy and Vancouver-Canada.
Methods:
Each of the three panels came to independent consensus about recovery priorities in SCI utilizing the features resource trade-off game. The procedure involves trading imagined levels of independence (resources) across different functional items (features) assuming different stages of recovery.
Results:
Sphincter management was of primary importance to all three groups. The Italian and Canadian rehabilitation professionals, however, showed preference for walking over wheelchair mobility at lower stages of assumed recovery, whereas the US professionals set wheelchair independence at a higher priority than walking.
Conclusions:
These preliminary results suggest cross-cultural recovery priority differences among SCI rehabilitation professionals. These dissimilarities in preference may reflect disparities in values, cultural expectations and health care policies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Ackery A, Tator C, Krassioukov A . A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21: 1355–1370.
The Rehabilitation Accreditation Commission. http://www.carf.org/consumer.aspx?Content=Content/ConsumerServices/cs03en.html&ID. Accessed July 26, 2005.
Kennedy P, Hamilton LR . The needs assessment checklist: a clinical approach to measuring outcome. Spinal Cord 1999; 37: 136–139.
Duff J, Evans MJ, Kennedy P . Goal planning: a retrospective audit of rehabilitation processes and outcome. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 275–286.
Norris-Baker C, Stephens MA, Rintala DA, Willems EP . Patient behavior as a predictor of outcomes in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1981; 62: 602–608.
McGrath JR, Adams L . Patient-centered goal planning: a systematic psychology therapy? Top Stroke Rehabil 1999; 6: 43–50.
Stineman MG, Maislin G, Nosek M, Fiedler R, Granger CV . Comparing consumer and clinician values for alternative functional states: application of a new feature trade-off consensus-building tool. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1522–1529.
Siosteen A, Kreuter M, Lampic C, Persson LO . Patient–staff agreement in the perception of spinal cord leisoned patients' problems, emotional well-being, and coping pattern. Spinal Cord 2005; 43: 179–186.
Ernst F . Contrasting perceptions of distress by research personnel and their spinal cord injured persons. Am J Phys Med 1987; 66: 12–15.
Cushman L, Dijkers M . Depressed mood in spinal cord injured patients: staff perceptions and patient realities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 191–196.
Trieschmann RB . Spinal cord injuries. Psychological, Social and Vocational Rehabilitation. Demos Publ: New York 1988.
Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB . Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1793–1803.
Fiedler IG, Laud PW, Maiman DJ, Apple DF . Economics of managed care in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1441–1449.
International Campaign for Cures of spinal cord injury paralysis. http://www.icord.org/iccp.html. Accessed July 24, 2005.
Tate DG, Kalpakjian CZA, Forchheimer MB . Quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83 (2 Suppl): S18–S25.
Manns PJ, Chad KE . Components of quality of life for persons with a quadriplegic and paraplegic spinal cord injury. Qual health Res 2001; 11: 795–811.
Dijkers MPJM, Whiteneck G, El-Jaroudi R . Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81 (Suppl 2): S63–S80.
Anderson K . Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21: 1371–1383.
Donnelly C et al. Client-centered assessment and the identification of meaningful treatment goals for individuals with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 302–307.
Estores IM . The consumer's perspective and the professional literature: what do persons with spinal cord injury want? J Rehabil Res Dev 2003; 40: 93–98.
Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS . The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 6–18.
Patrick M, Ditunno PL, Ditunno JF . A comparison of spinal cord injury (SCI) consumers/staff preference for walking: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med 2003; 26: S41.
Ditunno Jr JF et al. Walking Index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): an international multi-center validity and reliability study. Spinal Cord 2000; 38: 234–243.
Ditunno PL, Ditunno Jr JF . Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision. Spinal Cord 2001; 39: 654–656.
Curt A, Schwab ME, Dietz V . Providing the clinical basis for new international therapies: refined diagnosis and assessment of recovery after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 1–6.
Americans with Disability Act. 1990. http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/statutes/ofccp/ada.htm, accessed June 6, 2005.
Canadian Employment Equity Act. http://commissiondelafonctionpubliqueducanada.com/research/world_ps/canada_e.htm#5. Accessed June 6, 2005.
Glickman S, Kamm MA . Bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients. Lancet 1996; 347: 1651–1653.
Hicken BL, Putzke JD, Richards JS . Bladder management and quality of life after spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 916–922.
McColl MA, Charlifue S, Glass C, Savic G, Meehan M . International differences in ageing and spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2002; 40: 128–136.
Asplund K, Asburner S, Cargill K, Hux M, Lees K, Drummond M, GAIN International Investigators. Health care resource use and stroke outcome. Multinational comparisons within the GAIN International trial. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003; 19: 267–277.
Martikainen P, Lahelma E, Marmot M, Sekine M, Nishi N, Kagamimori S . A comparison of socioeconomic differences in physical functioning and perceived health among male and female employees in Britain, Finland, and Japan. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59: 1287–1295.
Sox HC et al. Medical Decision Making. Butterworth Publishers: Boston 1988.
Samuelson PA . Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press: Cambridge (MA) 1947.
Nicholson W . Comparative statistics analyses of individual demand. In: Heinz M (ed). Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions 1985, The Dryden Press: Philadelphia (PA), pp 119–166.
Beres D . Perception, imagination and reality. Int J Psyc-Analy 1960; 41: 327–334.
Goddard L, Jordan L . Changing attitudes about persons with disabilities: effects of a simulation. J Neurosci Nurs 1998; 30: 307–313.
Crotty M, Finucane P, Ahern M . Teaching medical students about disability and rehabilitation: methods and student feedback. Med Educ 2000; 34: 659–664.
Grayson E, Marini I . Simulated disability exercises and their impact on attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Int J Rehabil Res 1996; 19: 123–131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ditunno, P., Patrick, M., Stineman, M. et al. Cross-cultural differences in preference for recovery of mobility among spinal cord injury rehabilitation professionals. Spinal Cord 44, 567–575 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101876
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101876
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Overground robotic training effects on walking and secondary health conditions in individuals with spinal cord injury: systematic review
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (2022)
-
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury version II in acute spinal cord injury: reliability and reproducibility
Spinal Cord (2014)
-
The Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI/WISCI II): nature, metric properties, use and misuse
Spinal Cord (2013)
-
Consumer preference in ranking walking function utilizing the walking index for spinal cord injury II
Spinal Cord (2011)
-
Validity and reliability of the 10-m walk test and the 6-min walk test in spinal cord injury patients
Spinal Cord (2011)
