Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Patterns of junctional communication in the early amphibian embryo

Abstract

It has long been recognized that cells in early embryos can communicate with each other via a direct cell-to-cell pathway, probably mediated by gap junctions. Low electrical resistance pathways, detected electrophysiologically, have been identified in all species examined so far. However, studies in various embryos on the transfer of molecules larger than small ions (for example, fluorescent dyes in the molecular weight range 350–500) have given conflicting results1–5. In all these studies the ability to transfer dyes from cell to cell was determined without reference to the position of the injected cell in the embryo. In the experiments reported here, cell–cell transfer of the fluorescent dye, Lucifer yellow6 (molecular weight (Mr) 450) was re-examined in the early Xenopus laevis embryo by injecting the dye into identified cells, as the position of the injected cell within the embryo may be important. At the 32-cell stage, we found that dye transfer often occurred between animal pole blastomeres which were not sisters, as well as between sister cells, and also that Lucifer yellow was indeed transferred via gap junctions. The cell–cell transfer was not uniform within the animal pole; transfer was maximal near the dorsal side and minimal at the ventral side. This pattern may reflect differences in permeability or numbers of gap junctions across the embryo, and could be related to early events in development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett, M. V. L., Spira, M. E. & Spray, D. C. Devl Biol. 65, 114–125 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lo, C. W. & Gilula, N. B Cell 18, 411–422 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, M. V. L. in Intracellular Staining Techniques in Neurobiology (eds Kater, S. D. & Nicholson, C.) 115–142 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1973).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Tupper, J. T. & Saunders, J. W. Devl Biol. 27, 546–554 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Slack, C. & Palmer, J. P. Expl Cell Res. 55, 416–419 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart, W. W. Cell 14, 741–759 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Warner, A. E. & Lawrence, P. A. Cell 28, 243–252 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weir, M. P. & Lo, C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 3232–3235 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Simpson, I., Rose, B. & Loewenstein, W. R. Science 195, 294–296 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Warner, A. E., Guthrie, S. C. & Gilula, N. B. Nature 310, 127–131 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guthrie, S. Patterns of junctional communication in the early amphibian embryo. Nature 311, 149–151 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/311149a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/311149a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing